Speed Up WAN Link..Ideas needed

Ali Jawad alijawad1 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 18 14:38:39 PST 2011


Hi
Did svn up to 897 ..did make clean and called make, will update with
results, if I get errors will disable zlib and report back as well.
Regards

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>wrote:

> I meant the binary on both the client and the server.
>
> To disable zlib, just comment out or remove the lines like these in
> each codec configuration.
>
> set codec0.compressor zlib
> set codec0.compressor_level 6
>
> But actually, it would probably be best for you to just update and
> rebuild without changing your configuration.  Just do "svn up" at the
> top level directory and do "make clean" and "make" in
> programs/wanproxy.
>
> Thanks!
> Juli.
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 14:28, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> > First of all, let me express my appreciations for all the support and
> help,
> > Open source products are the result of collaboration between the people
> who
> > do the hard work like yourself, and people who make use of the
> > creativity/productivity of people like yourself, that would be me :). So
> I
> > do not mind doing some testing and debugging.
> > Having said that, you want me to make clean and make recompile at the
> trunk
> > level ? How to test without zlib/zcodec ? Removing parts of config ? The
> > only binary I am using is wanproxy that I copied to /usr/sbin/ did I miss
> > something here ? What is the second binary ?
> > Regards
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I thought I had fixed this problem.  You are using both zlib and
> >> xcodec, right?  I do not understand how this error could still be
> >> happening.  If you could try with only xcodec or only zlib, that might
> >> be helpful to me, so I know which component is in need of further
> >> testing.
> >>
> >> Also, if you want to update the whole tree and rebuild both binaries,
> >> I've added some messages which should make it easier to tell which
> >> PipeProducer subclass is doing the wrong thing here.
> >>
> >> Apologies for all the difficulty.  I want you to know that I have been
> >> testing this, and did originally see the problem you report here, but
> >> did find a way to fix it.  I have some work I need to do today that I
> >> do not want to disrupt, but I am hoping that later in my evening (I'm
> >> on the west coast of the US) I will be able to set up a few more
> >> systems to use in testing, and see if I can trigger this bug.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> > Client crashed when a page displayed flash, with following error
> >> >
> >> > 1324214230.331051 [/assert] EMERG: void
> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*):
> >> > Halting: Assertion (!output_eos_) failed at
> >> > ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in function void
> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
> >> > Aborted
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi July
> >> >> I was able to make the connection work, it was a stupid mistake on my
> >> >> side, the errors are less and performance is slightly better but
> still
> >> >> slow
> >> >> I am getting these errors on client side now
> >> >>
> >> >> 1324212755.168570 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >> 1324212756.652634 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >> 1324212776.041883 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >> 1324212777.468335 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>
> >> >> On server side I am getting
> >> >>
> >> >> 1324184191.330804 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >> 1324184194.297132 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >> 1324184202.948238 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >> 1324184202.951848 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >> 1324184217.752559 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >> 1324184217.755806 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Juli Mallett <
> juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Very strange.  Can you send the client and server configurations?
>  I'm
> >> >>> guessing that connect is failing because the ports are mismatched or
> >> >>> similar, but I can't be sure.  It would also be helpful if you could
> >> >>> telnet from the client to the port the server is supposed to be
> >> >>> listening on, to verify that there are no firewalling issues
> involved.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 15:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>> > Hi Juli
> >> >>> > Did checkout to version 895 on both machines and did the following
> >> >>> > on
> >> >>> > both
> >> >>> > machines as well , make clean in programs/wanproxy, make, copy
> >> >>> > wanproxy
> >> >>> > file
> >> >>> > to /usr/sbin/ then launch
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c /etc/wanproxy.conf
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On the client I get
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > 1324163928.337113 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/listener] INFO:
> Listening
> >> >>> > on:
> >> >>> > [0.0.0.0]:3300
> >> >>> > 1324163928.337732 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event thread.
> >> >>> > 1324163930.640914 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO: Connect
> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> > 1324163931.393061 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO: Connect
> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> > 1324163932.144333 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO: Connect
> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> > 1324163932.919439 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO: Connect
> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> > 1324163933.906755 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO: Connect
> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> > 1324163934.677630 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO: Connect
> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> > 1324163935.459671 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO: Connect
> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > And the browser is not working when setting socks to use wanproxy
> >> >>> > client.
> >> >>> > Anything I missed here ?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Thanks
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Hi
> >> >>> >> The problem happened on the latest trunk that I donwload just
> after
> >> >>> >> your
> >> >>> >> latest email, I will checkout trunk, clean and make and send
> >> >>> >> output.
> >> >>> >> Thank agains
> >> >>> >> Regards
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> First, update to latest trunk since I fixed the issues you've
> >> >>> >>> reported so
> >> >>> >>> far.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> Then could you go to programs/wanproxy on the client, "make
> >> >>> >>> clean",
> >> >>> >>> and then send all of the output of "make" to the list?
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
> >> >>> >>> Juli.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:23, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> > Hi Juli
> >> >>> >>> > Thanks for the continous help, I have one on the latest trunk,
> >> >>> >>> > but
> >> >>> >>> > the
> >> >>> >>> > client I get errors while compiling the trunk on, the problem
> is
> >> >>> >>> > related to
> >> >>> >>> > this it seems  "result of make in programs/wanproxy/"
> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >>> >>> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
> >> >>> >>> >>> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
> non-virtual
> >> >>> >>> >>> destructor
> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’ has
> >> >>> >>> >>> virtual
> >> >>> >>> >>> functions
> >> >>> >>> >>> but non-virtual destructor
> >> >>> >>> >>> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> Hi Ali,
> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks for pointing out the problems with -Wnon-virtual-dtor
>> >> >>> >>> >> I
> >> >>> >>> >> fixed
> >> >>> >>> >> those just now.
> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> You need to have the client and server running the same
> >> >>> >>> >> version.
> >> >>> >>> >>  The
> >> >>> >>> >> protocol has changed considerable from 0.7.2 to today, and
> you
> >> >>> >>> >> should
> >> >>> >>> >> not mix the two.
> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> That said, I think you may have some other problem with the
> >> >>> >>> >> errors
> >> >>> >>> >> you're seeing; I don't think the mix of versions would
> explain
> >> >>> >>> >> it.
> >> >>> >>> >> Still, if you would update both to trunk and report any
> issues
> >> >>> >>> >> you
> >> >>> >>> >> encounter back, I'll try to fix them as soon as possible.  If
> >> >>> >>> >> you
> >> >>> >>> >> continue to experience issues, I'll set up a CentOS VM to
> test
> >> >>> >>> >> everything myself before asking you to do so again.
> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> Sorry about the continued difficulty.  I usually try very
> hard
> >> >>> >>> >> to
> >> >>> >>> >> make
> >> >>> >>> >> sure users have a seamless experience of building and using
> >> >>> >>> >> WANProxy.
> >> >>> >>> >> Once this is all resolved, I'll put out a release tarball,
> too.
> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
> >> >>> >>> >> Juli.
> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 05:44, Ali Jawad <
> alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> > Right now using latest trunk for server, and latest tgz for
> >> >>> >>> >> > client
> >> >>> >>> >> >  I am
> >> >>> >>> >> > getting this error
> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >>> >> > [root at CentOS54 programs]# /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c
> >> >>> >>> >> >  /etc/wanproxy.conf
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.168662 [/wanproxy] INFO: WANProxy 0.7.2
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.169621 [/wanproxy] INFO: Copyright (c) 2008-2011
> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.org.
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.170510 [/wanproxy] INFO: All rights reserved.
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.171419 [/wanproxy/config] INFO: Configuring
> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173140 [/io/system] INFO: Starting IO system.
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173861 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event
> >> >>> >>> >> > thread.
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.092574 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.895308 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129320.699028 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129321.499178 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >>> >> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> >> If I go to the programs/wanproxy and just make there I get
> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
> >> >>> >>> >> >> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
> >> >>> >>> >> >> non-virtual
> >> >>> >>> >> >> destructor
> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’ has
> >> >>> >>> >> >> virtual
> >> >>> >>> >> >> functions
> >> >>> >>> >> >> but non-virtual destructor
> >> >>> >>> >> >> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Hi Ali,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> The problems you encountered should be fixed in
> Subversion.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Can
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> you
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> please provide the errors you encountered?  Most
> commonly,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> problem
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> is missing libuuid-dev or similar package, at least on
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Linux
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> systems.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Thanks!
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Juli.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:56, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Hi
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > I tried to install latest src code but did only run in
> to
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > during compiling, but 0.7.2 did not face any issues,
> did
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > you
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > face
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems with websites opening during that error ?
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Regards
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Diego Woitasen
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > <diego at woitasen.com.ar>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Ali,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 13:08, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> and on the client I am getting
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524646.018556 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ERR:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> event:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <Error>/32
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [Broken pipe]
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524690.407944 [/assert] EMERG: void
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*): Halting: Assertion
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> (!output_eos_)
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed at ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> function
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Aborted
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks.  Several other users have reported this, but
> I
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> have
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> not
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> been
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> able to reproduce it.  I will redouble my efforts to
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> reproduce.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Hi
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Browsers are FF 4.x and 3.x on Windows and Linux, I
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> also
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tried
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> IE8,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the config is the same one given in the examples,
> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> OS
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> is
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> CentOS
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 5.6
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 64bit.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Regards
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks for the feedback.  I don't think I will
> need
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> access,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> may
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need more configuration information to reproduce.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> OS
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> WANProxy
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> running on?  Can you send your configuration?
>  What
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> browser
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> client?
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks!
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 13:44, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Hi
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the help so far, I might be able to
> give
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> access
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> check it out if needed, as for now no IPV6, sites
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> like
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> cnn
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> youtube etc
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> This seems very strange.  Which sites?  Do you
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> have
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv6
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> connectivity?
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you don't have IPv6 connectivity, I wonder
> if
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> that
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> might
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> be
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> problem, and we might need some way to tell
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> WANProxy
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> use
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv4
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> only.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you have specific examples that likely will
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> make
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> it
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> easier
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> for me
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to reproduce and fix.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks & sorry to hear about your difficulty,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Juli.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:04, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Hi
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I completed the setup, but some sites open and
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sites
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> need to be reloaded a few times for it to work,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I.e.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> CSS
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> does
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not load
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> etc.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas ?
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Regards
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ali,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you already have the SOCKS example
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configured,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> then
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> should be
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> able to use your browser or operating system's
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> proxy
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configuration to
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell it to use SOCKS for HTTP or FTP or
> whatever
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> protocols
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> need.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have trouble finding this and tell us
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> what
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> OS
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> browser or
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> other software you're using I'm sure one of us
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> can
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> help
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> get the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> information you need!
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Juli.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 03:26, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did setup wanproxy in client/server mode as
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> per
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Proxying over a
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN using SOCKS example in
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://wanproxy.org/examples.shtml
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> . Here
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is the issue
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do have a server in Asia which is the
> client
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> a
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in the USA
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> which is the wanproxy server, I want traffic
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> for
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsing
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through the wanproxy link and from there on
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> fetch
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sites I
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need in
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the states and send them back after that
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> link
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client server which sends them to the browser
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in my LAN.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is this something WAN proxy does ? Do I need
> to
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> do
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> additional
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> stuff ?
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Such as setting up SQUID on wanproxy server
> or
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Is any
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ip forwarding needed ? What configuration
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> should I
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> use
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsers
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ?
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry for the long list of questions,
> but
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> am
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> will come
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in handy for people who research the topic
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> online
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> "once
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> answered that
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is :)"
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy mailing list
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy mailing list
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Hi,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  I had that error with the 0.7.2 release. I'm using
> the
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> latest
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> code
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> from subversion and I haven't seen the error again.
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Regards,
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  Diego
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --
> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Diego Woitasen
> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wanproxy.org/pipermail/wanproxy-wanproxy.org/attachments/20111219/2f9bbabb/attachment-0005.htm>


More information about the wanproxy mailing list