Speed Up WAN Link..Ideas needed

Ali Jawad alijawad1 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 18 15:38:17 PST 2011


Hi
My initial settings are same as the Proxying over a WAN using SOCKS
Example, in this example Zlib is not enabled and I get the error mentioned
in the last emails, upon disabling xcodec and enabling zlib as in the
config example "only relevant top part" I get this error :


Server

create codec codec0
#set codec0.codec XCodec
#activate codec0

set codec0.compressor zlib
set codec0.compressor_level 6
activate codec0


Client

create codec codec0
#set codec0.codec XCodec
#activate codec0

set codec0.compressor zlib
set codec0.compressor_level 6
activate codec0


I get this error :
1324250995.222191 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
[Connection reset by peer]
*1324250995.222342 [/zlib/deflate_pipe] ERR: virtual
DeflatePipe::~DeflatePipe(): Deflate stream did not end cleanly.*

When I commented out the activate codec line using the same config copied
above I got this error :

1324251200.589366 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
[Connection reset by peer]




On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
> Did svn up to 897 ..did make clean and called make, will update with
> results, if I get errors will disable zlib and report back as well.
> Regards
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>wrote:
>
>> I meant the binary on both the client and the server.
>>
>> To disable zlib, just comment out or remove the lines like these in
>> each codec configuration.
>>
>> set codec0.compressor zlib
>> set codec0.compressor_level 6
>>
>> But actually, it would probably be best for you to just update and
>> rebuild without changing your configuration.  Just do "svn up" at the
>> top level directory and do "make clean" and "make" in
>> programs/wanproxy.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Juli.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 14:28, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > First of all, let me express my appreciations for all the support and
>> help,
>> > Open source products are the result of collaboration between the people
>> who
>> > do the hard work like yourself, and people who make use of the
>> > creativity/productivity of people like yourself, that would be me :).
>> So I
>> > do not mind doing some testing and debugging.
>> > Having said that, you want me to make clean and make recompile at the
>> trunk
>> > level ? How to test without zlib/zcodec ? Removing parts of config ? The
>> > only binary I am using is wanproxy that I copied to /usr/sbin/ did I
>> miss
>> > something here ? What is the second binary ?
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I thought I had fixed this problem.  You are using both zlib and
>> >> xcodec, right?  I do not understand how this error could still be
>> >> happening.  If you could try with only xcodec or only zlib, that might
>> >> be helpful to me, so I know which component is in need of further
>> >> testing.
>> >>
>> >> Also, if you want to update the whole tree and rebuild both binaries,
>> >> I've added some messages which should make it easier to tell which
>> >> PipeProducer subclass is doing the wrong thing here.
>> >>
>> >> Apologies for all the difficulty.  I want you to know that I have been
>> >> testing this, and did originally see the problem you report here, but
>> >> did find a way to fix it.  I have some work I need to do today that I
>> >> do not want to disrupt, but I am hoping that later in my evening (I'm
>> >> on the west coast of the US) I will be able to set up a few more
>> >> systems to use in testing, and see if I can trigger this bug.
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi
>> >> > Client crashed when a page displayed flash, with following error
>> >> >
>> >> > 1324214230.331051 [/assert] EMERG: void
>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*):
>> >> > Halting: Assertion (!output_eos_) failed at
>> >> > ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in function void
>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>> >> > Aborted
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi July
>> >> >> I was able to make the connection work, it was a stupid mistake on
>> my
>> >> >> side, the errors are less and performance is slightly better but
>> still
>> >> >> slow
>> >> >> I am getting these errors on client side now
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1324212755.168570 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >> 1324212756.652634 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >> 1324212776.041883 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >> 1324212777.468335 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On server side I am getting
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1324184191.330804 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >> 1324184194.297132 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >> 1324184202.948238 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >> 1324184202.951848 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >> 1324184217.752559 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >> 1324184217.755806 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> <Error>/104
>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Juli Mallett <
>> juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Very strange.  Can you send the client and server configurations?
>>  I'm
>> >> >>> guessing that connect is failing because the ports are mismatched
>> or
>> >> >>> similar, but I can't be sure.  It would also be helpful if you
>> could
>> >> >>> telnet from the client to the port the server is supposed to be
>> >> >>> listening on, to verify that there are no firewalling issues
>> involved.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 15:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> > Hi Juli
>> >> >>> > Did checkout to version 895 on both machines and did the
>> following
>> >> >>> > on
>> >> >>> > both
>> >> >>> > machines as well , make clean in programs/wanproxy, make, copy
>> >> >>> > wanproxy
>> >> >>> > file
>> >> >>> > to /usr/sbin/ then launch
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c /etc/wanproxy.conf
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On the client I get
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337113 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/listener] INFO:
>> Listening
>> >> >>> > on:
>> >> >>> > [0.0.0.0]:3300
>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337732 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event thread.
>> >> >>> > 1324163930.640914 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> Connect
>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> > 1324163931.393061 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> Connect
>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> > 1324163932.144333 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> Connect
>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> > 1324163932.919439 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> Connect
>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> > 1324163933.906755 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> Connect
>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> > 1324163934.677630 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> Connect
>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> > 1324163935.459671 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> Connect
>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > And the browser is not working when setting socks to use wanproxy
>> >> >>> > client.
>> >> >>> > Anything I missed here ?
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Thanks
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Hi
>> >> >>> >> The problem happened on the latest trunk that I donwload just
>> after
>> >> >>> >> your
>> >> >>> >> latest email, I will checkout trunk, clean and make and send
>> >> >>> >> output.
>> >> >>> >> Thank agains
>> >> >>> >> Regards
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> First, update to latest trunk since I fixed the issues you've
>> >> >>> >>> reported so
>> >> >>> >>> far.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> Then could you go to programs/wanproxy on the client, "make
>> >> >>> >>> clean",
>> >> >>> >>> and then send all of the output of "make" to the list?
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
>> >> >>> >>> Juli.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:23, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> > Hi Juli
>> >> >>> >>> > Thanks for the continous help, I have one on the latest
>> trunk,
>> >> >>> >>> > but
>> >> >>> >>> > the
>> >> >>> >>> > client I get errors while compiling the trunk on, the
>> problem is
>> >> >>> >>> > related to
>> >> >>> >>> > this it seems  "result of make in programs/wanproxy/"
>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >>> >>> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
>> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
>> >> >>> >>> >>> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
>> non-virtual
>> >> >>> >>> >>> destructor
>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’ has
>> >> >>> >>> >>> virtual
>> >> >>> >>> >>> functions
>> >> >>> >>> >>> but non-virtual destructor
>> >> >>> >>> >>> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> Hi Ali,
>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks for pointing out the problems with
>> -Wnon-virtual-dtor —
>> >> >>> >>> >> I
>> >> >>> >>> >> fixed
>> >> >>> >>> >> those just now.
>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> You need to have the client and server running the same
>> >> >>> >>> >> version.
>> >> >>> >>> >>  The
>> >> >>> >>> >> protocol has changed considerable from 0.7.2 to today, and
>> you
>> >> >>> >>> >> should
>> >> >>> >>> >> not mix the two.
>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> That said, I think you may have some other problem with the
>> >> >>> >>> >> errors
>> >> >>> >>> >> you're seeing; I don't think the mix of versions would
>> explain
>> >> >>> >>> >> it.
>> >> >>> >>> >> Still, if you would update both to trunk and report any
>> issues
>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >> >>> >>> >> encounter back, I'll try to fix them as soon as possible.
>>  If
>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >> >>> >>> >> continue to experience issues, I'll set up a CentOS VM to
>> test
>> >> >>> >>> >> everything myself before asking you to do so again.
>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> Sorry about the continued difficulty.  I usually try very
>> hard
>> >> >>> >>> >> to
>> >> >>> >>> >> make
>> >> >>> >>> >> sure users have a seamless experience of building and using
>> >> >>> >>> >> WANProxy.
>> >> >>> >>> >> Once this is all resolved, I'll put out a release tarball,
>> too.
>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
>> >> >>> >>> >> Juli.
>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 05:44, Ali Jawad <
>> alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> > Right now using latest trunk for server, and latest tgz
>> for
>> >> >>> >>> >> > client
>> >> >>> >>> >> >  I am
>> >> >>> >>> >> > getting this error
>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >>> >> > [root at CentOS54 programs]# /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c
>> >> >>> >>> >> >  /etc/wanproxy.conf
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.168662 [/wanproxy] INFO: WANProxy 0.7.2
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.169621 [/wanproxy] INFO: Copyright (c)
>> 2008-2011
>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.org.
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.170510 [/wanproxy] INFO: All rights reserved.
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.171419 [/wanproxy/config] INFO: Configuring
>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173140 [/io/system] INFO: Starting IO system.
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173861 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event
>> >> >>> >>> >> > thread.
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.092574 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.895308 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129320.699028 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129321.499178 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >>> >> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> If I go to the programs/wanproxy and just make there I
>> get
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> non-virtual
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> destructor
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’ has
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> virtual
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> functions
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> but non-virtual destructor
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Hi Ali,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> The problems you encountered should be fixed in
>> Subversion.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Can
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> you
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> please provide the errors you encountered?  Most
>> commonly,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> problem
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> is missing libuuid-dev or similar package, at least on
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Linux
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> systems.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Thanks!
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Juli.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:56, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Hi
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > I tried to install latest src code but did only run
>> in to
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > during compiling, but 0.7.2 did not face any issues,
>> did
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > you
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > face
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems with websites opening during that error ?
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Regards
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Diego Woitasen
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > <diego at woitasen.com.ar>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Ali,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 13:08, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> and on the client I am getting
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524646.018556
>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ERR:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> event:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <Error>/32
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [Broken pipe]
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524690.407944 [/assert] EMERG: void
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*): Halting: Assertion
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> (!output_eos_)
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed at ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> function
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Aborted
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks.  Several other users have reported this,
>> but I
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> have
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> not
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> been
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> able to reproduce it.  I will redouble my efforts to
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> reproduce.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Hi
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Browsers are FF 4.x and 3.x on Windows and Linux,
>> I
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> also
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tried
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> IE8,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the config is the same one given in the examples,
>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> OS
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> is
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> CentOS
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 5.6
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 64bit.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Regards
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks for the feedback.  I don't think I will
>> need
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> access,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> may
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need more configuration information to reproduce.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> OS
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> WANProxy
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> running on?  Can you send your configuration?
>>  What
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> browser
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> client?
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks!
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 13:44, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Hi
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the help so far, I might be able to
>> give
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> access
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> check it out if needed, as for now no IPV6,
>> sites
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> like
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> cnn
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> youtube etc
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> This seems very strange.  Which sites?  Do you
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> have
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv6
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> connectivity?
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you don't have IPv6 connectivity, I wonder
>> if
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> that
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> might
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> be
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> problem, and we might need some way to tell
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> WANProxy
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> use
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv4
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> only.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you have specific examples that likely will
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> make
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> it
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> easier
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> for me
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to reproduce and fix.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks & sorry to hear about your difficulty,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Juli.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:04, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Hi
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I completed the setup, but some sites open and
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sites
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> need to be reloaded a few times for it to
>> work,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I.e.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> CSS
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> does
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not load
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> etc.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas ?
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Regards
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ali,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you already have the SOCKS example
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configured,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> then
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> should be
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> able to use your browser or operating
>> system's
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> proxy
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configuration to
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell it to use SOCKS for HTTP or FTP or
>> whatever
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> protocols
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> need.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have trouble finding this and tell us
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> what
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> OS
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> browser or
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> other software you're using I'm sure one of
>> us
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> can
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> help
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> get the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> information you need!
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Juli.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 03:26, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did setup wanproxy in client/server mode
>> as
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> per
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Proxying over a
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN using SOCKS example in
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://wanproxy.org/examples.shtml
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> . Here
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is the issue
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do have a server in Asia which is the
>> client
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> and
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> a
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in the USA
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> which is the wanproxy server, I want traffic
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> for
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsing
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through the wanproxy link and from there on
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> fetch
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sites I
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need in
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the states and send them back after that
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> link
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client server which sends them to the
>> browser
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in my LAN.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is this something WAN proxy does ? Do I
>> need to
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> do
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> additional
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> stuff ?
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Such as setting up SQUID on wanproxy server
>> or
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Is any
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ip forwarding needed ? What configuration
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> should I
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> use
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsers
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ?
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry for the long list of questions,
>> but
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> am
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sure
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> will come
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in handy for people who research the topic
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> online
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> "once
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> answered that
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is :)"
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy mailing list
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy mailing list
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Hi,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  I had that error with the 0.7.2 release. I'm using
>> the
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> latest
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> code
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> from subversion and I haven't seen the error again.
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Regards,
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  Diego
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Diego Woitasen
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wanproxy.org/pipermail/wanproxy-wanproxy.org/attachments/20111219/b78c3837/attachment-0005.htm>


More information about the wanproxy mailing list