Speed Up WAN Link..Ideas needed

Ali Jawad alijawad1 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 19 11:03:12 PST 2011


Hi
I have to note that I did do the testing with a partner at a different
physical location. My Linux laptop with FF and Chrome did not cause a
crash, his Chrome/FF and IE caused the crash. I will retest with him today
and let you know results. What is better to use in terms of speed zlib or
xcodec ?
Regards

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>wrote:

> Neither of those errors is necessarily bad.  A lot of connections get
> closed that way.  The thing about the deflate stream not ending neatly
> is also not uncommon.  Were you able to access websites with that
> configuration?  It's the crash that you saw earlier that concerns me
> as long as everything else is working alright.
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 15:38, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> > My initial settings are same as the
> >
> > Proxying over a WAN using SOCKS
> >
> > Example, in this example Zlib is not enabled and I get the error
> mentioned
> > in the last emails, upon disabling xcodec and enabling zlib as in the
> config
> > example "only relevant top part" I get this error :
> >
> >
> > Server
> >
> > create codec codec0
> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
> > #activate codec0
> >
> > set codec0.compressor zlib
> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
> > activate codec0
> >
> >
> > Client
> >
> > create codec codec0
> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
> > #activate codec0
> >
> > set codec0.compressor zlib
> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
> > activate codec0
> >
> >
> > I get this error :
> > 1324250995.222191 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> > [Connection reset by peer]
> > 1324250995.222342 [/zlib/deflate_pipe] ERR: virtual
> > DeflatePipe::~DeflatePipe(): Deflate stream did not end cleanly.
> >
> > When I commented out the activate codec line using the same config copied
> > above I got this error :
> >
> > 1324251200.589366 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> > [Connection reset by peer]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >> Did svn up to 897 ..did make clean and called make, will update with
> >> results, if I get errors will disable zlib and report back as well.
> >> Regards
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I meant the binary on both the client and the server.
> >>>
> >>> To disable zlib, just comment out or remove the lines like these in
> >>> each codec configuration.
> >>>
> >>> set codec0.compressor zlib
> >>> set codec0.compressor_level 6
> >>>
> >>> But actually, it would probably be best for you to just update and
> >>> rebuild without changing your configuration.  Just do "svn up" at the
> >>> top level directory and do "make clean" and "make" in
> >>> programs/wanproxy.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Juli.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 14:28, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi
> >>> > First of all, let me express my appreciations for all the support and
> >>> > help,
> >>> > Open source products are the result of collaboration between the
> people
> >>> > who
> >>> > do the hard work like yourself, and people who make use of the
> >>> > creativity/productivity of people like yourself, that would be me :).
> >>> > So I
> >>> > do not mind doing some testing and debugging.
> >>> > Having said that, you want me to make clean and make recompile at the
> >>> > trunk
> >>> > level ? How to test without zlib/zcodec ? Removing parts of config ?
> >>> > The
> >>> > only binary I am using is wanproxy that I copied to /usr/sbin/ did I
> >>> > miss
> >>> > something here ? What is the second binary ?
> >>> > Regards
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Juli Mallett <
> juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I thought I had fixed this problem.  You are using both zlib and
> >>> >> xcodec, right?  I do not understand how this error could still be
> >>> >> happening.  If you could try with only xcodec or only zlib, that
> might
> >>> >> be helpful to me, so I know which component is in need of further
> >>> >> testing.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Also, if you want to update the whole tree and rebuild both
> binaries,
> >>> >> I've added some messages which should make it easier to tell which
> >>> >> PipeProducer subclass is doing the wrong thing here.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Apologies for all the difficulty.  I want you to know that I have
> been
> >>> >> testing this, and did originally see the problem you report here,
> but
> >>> >> did find a way to fix it.  I have some work I need to do today that
> I
> >>> >> do not want to disrupt, but I am hoping that later in my evening
> (I'm
> >>> >> on the west coast of the US) I will be able to set up a few more
> >>> >> systems to use in testing, and see if I can trigger this bug.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >> > Hi
> >>> >> > Client crashed when a page displayed flash, with following error
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > 1324214230.331051 [/assert] EMERG: void
> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*):
> >>> >> > Halting: Assertion (!output_eos_) failed at
> >>> >> > ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in function void
> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
> >>> >> > Aborted
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Regards
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Hi July
> >>> >> >> I was able to make the connection work, it was a stupid mistake
> on
> >>> >> >> my
> >>> >> >> side, the errors are less and performance is slightly better but
> >>> >> >> still
> >>> >> >> slow
> >>> >> >> I am getting these errors on client side now
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> 1324212755.168570 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >> 1324212756.652634 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >> 1324212776.041883 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >> 1324212777.468335 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On server side I am getting
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> 1324184191.330804 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
> >>> >> >> void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >> 1324184194.297132 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
> >>> >> >> void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >> 1324184202.948238 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
> >>> >> >> void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >> 1324184202.951848 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
> >>> >> >> void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >> 1324184217.752559 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
> >>> >> >> void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >> 1324184217.755806 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
> >>> >> >> void
> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Regards
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Juli Mallett
> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> Very strange.  Can you send the client and server
> configurations?
> >>> >> >>>  I'm
> >>> >> >>> guessing that connect is failing because the ports are
> mismatched
> >>> >> >>> or
> >>> >> >>> similar, but I can't be sure.  It would also be helpful if you
> >>> >> >>> could
> >>> >> >>> telnet from the client to the port the server is supposed to be
> >>> >> >>> listening on, to verify that there are no firewalling issues
> >>> >> >>> involved.
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 15:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> > Hi Juli
> >>> >> >>> > Did checkout to version 895 on both machines and did the
> >>> >> >>> > following
> >>> >> >>> > on
> >>> >> >>> > both
> >>> >> >>> > machines as well , make clean in programs/wanproxy, make, copy
> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
> >>> >> >>> > file
> >>> >> >>> > to /usr/sbin/ then launch
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c /etc/wanproxy.conf
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > On the client I get
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337113 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/listener] INFO:
> >>> >> >>> > Listening
> >>> >> >>> > on:
> >>> >> >>> > [0.0.0.0]:3300
> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337732 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event thread.
> >>> >> >>> > 1324163930.640914 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> > 1324163931.393061 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.144333 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.919439 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> > 1324163933.906755 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> > 1324163934.677630 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> > 1324163935.459671 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > And the browser is not working when setting socks to use
> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
> >>> >> >>> > client.
> >>> >> >>> > Anything I missed here ?
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > Thanks
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ali Jawad <
> alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >> Hi
> >>> >> >>> >> The problem happened on the latest trunk that I donwload just
> >>> >> >>> >> after
> >>> >> >>> >> your
> >>> >> >>> >> latest email, I will checkout trunk, clean and make and send
> >>> >> >>> >> output.
> >>> >> >>> >> Thank agains
> >>> >> >>> >> Regards
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >>> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> First, update to latest trunk since I fixed the issues
> you've
> >>> >> >>> >>> reported so
> >>> >> >>> >>> far.
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> Then could you go to programs/wanproxy on the client, "make
> >>> >> >>> >>> clean",
> >>> >> >>> >>> and then send all of the output of "make" to the list?
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
> >>> >> >>> >>> Juli.
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:23, Ali Jawad <
> alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> > Hi Juli
> >>> >> >>> >>> > Thanks for the continous help, I have one on the latest
> >>> >> >>> >>> > trunk,
> >>> >> >>> >>> > but
> >>> >> >>> >>> > the
> >>> >> >>> >>> > client I get errors while compiling the trunk on, the
> >>> >> >>> >>> > problem is
> >>> >> >>> >>> > related to
> >>> >> >>> >>> > this it seems  "result of make in programs/wanproxy/"
> >>> >> >>> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> non-virtual
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> destructor
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’ has
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> virtual
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> functions
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> but non-virtual destructor
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
> >>> >> >>> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Juli Mallett
> >>> >> >>> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Hi Ali,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks for pointing out the problems with
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -Wnon-virtual-dtor —
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> fixed
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> those just now.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> You need to have the client and server running the same
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> version.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  The
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> protocol has changed considerable from 0.7.2 to today,
> and
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> should
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> not mix the two.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> That said, I think you may have some other problem with
> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> errors
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you're seeing; I don't think the mix of versions would
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> explain
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> it.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Still, if you would update both to trunk and report any
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> issues
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> encounter back, I'll try to fix them as soon as possible.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  If
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> continue to experience issues, I'll set up a CentOS VM to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> test
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> everything myself before asking you to do so again.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Sorry about the continued difficulty.  I usually try very
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> hard
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> make
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> sure users have a seamless experience of building and
> using
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> WANProxy.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Once this is all resolved, I'll put out a release
> tarball,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> too.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Juli.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 05:44, Ali Jawad
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Right now using latest trunk for server, and latest tgz
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > for
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > client
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  I am
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > getting this error
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [root at CentOS54 programs]# /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  /etc/wanproxy.conf
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.168662 [/wanproxy] INFO: WANProxy 0.7.2
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.169621 [/wanproxy] INFO: Copyright (c)
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 2008-2011
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.org.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.170510 [/wanproxy] INFO: All rights
> reserved.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.171419 [/wanproxy/config] INFO: Configuring
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173140 [/io/system] INFO: Starting IO
> system.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173861 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > thread.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.092574 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.895308 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129320.699028 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129321.499178 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ali Jawad
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> If I go to the programs/wanproxy and just make there I
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> get
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> non-virtual
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> destructor
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’
> has
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> virtual
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> functions
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> but non-virtual destructor
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Juli Mallett
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Hi Ali,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> The problems you encountered should be fixed in
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Subversion.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Can
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> please provide the errors you encountered?  Most
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> commonly,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> problem
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> is missing libuuid-dev or similar package, at least
> on
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Linux
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> systems.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Thanks!
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Juli.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:56, Ali Jawad
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Hi
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > I tried to install latest src code but did only run
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > in to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > during compiling, but 0.7.2 did not face any
> issues,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > did
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > face
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems with websites opening during that error ?
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Regards
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Diego Woitasen
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > <diego at woitasen.com.ar>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Juli Mallett
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Ali,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 13:08, Ali Jawad
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> and on the client I am getting
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524646.018556
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ERR:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event):
> Unexpected
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> event:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <Error>/32
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [Broken pipe]
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524690.407944 [/assert] EMERG: void
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*): Halting:
> Assertion
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> (!output_eos_)
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed at ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> function
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Aborted
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks.  Several other users have reported this,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> but I
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> have
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> not
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> been
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> able to reproduce it.  I will redouble my efforts
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> reproduce.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Ali Jawad
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Hi
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Browsers are FF 4.x and 3.x on Windows and
> Linux,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> also
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tried
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> IE8,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the config is the same one given in the
> examples,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> OS
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> is
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> CentOS
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 5.6
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 64bit.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Regards
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Juli Mallett
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks for the feedback.  I don't think I will
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> access,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> may
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need more configuration information to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> reproduce.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> OS
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> WANProxy
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> running on?  Can you send your configuration?
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> browser
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> client?
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks!
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 13:44, Ali Jawad
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Hi
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the help so far, I might be able
> to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> give
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> access
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> check it out if needed, as for now no IPV6,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> sites
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> like
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> cnn
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> youtube etc
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Juli
> Mallett
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> This seems very strange.  Which sites?  Do
> you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> have
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv6
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> connectivity?
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you don't have IPv6 connectivity, I
> wonder
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> if
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> that
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> might
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> be
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> problem, and we might need some way to tell
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> WANProxy
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> use
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv4
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> only.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you have specific examples that likely
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> will
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> make
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> it
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> easier
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> for me
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to reproduce and fix.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks & sorry to hear about your
> difficulty,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Juli.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:04, Ali Jawad
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I completed the setup, but some sites open
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sites
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> need to be reloaded a few times for it to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> work,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I.e.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> CSS
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> does
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not load
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas ?
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli
> Mallett
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ali,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you already have the SOCKS example
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configured,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> then
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> should be
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> able to use your browser or operating
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> system's
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> proxy
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configuration to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell it to use SOCKS for HTTP or FTP or
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> whatever
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> protocols
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> need.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have trouble finding this and tell
> us
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> what
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> OS
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> browser or
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> other software you're using I'm sure one
> of
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> can
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> help
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> get the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> information you need!
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Juli.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 03:26, Ali Jawad
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did setup wanproxy in client/server
> mode
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> per
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Proxying over a
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN using SOCKS example in
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://wanproxy.org/examples.shtml
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> . Here
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is the issue
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do have a server in Asia which is the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in the USA
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> which is the wanproxy server, I want
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> traffic
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsing
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through the wanproxy link and from there
> on
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> fetch
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sites I
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need in
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the states and send them back after that
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> link
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client server which sends them to the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browser
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in my LAN.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is this something WAN proxy does ? Do I
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need to
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> do
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> additional
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> stuff ?
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Such as setting up SQUID on wanproxy
> server
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Is any
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ip forwarding needed ? What configuration
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> should I
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> use
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsers
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ?
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry for the long list of
> questions,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> but
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> am
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> will come
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in handy for people who research the
> topic
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> online
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> "once
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> answered that
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is :)"
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy mailing list
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy mailing list
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Hi,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  I had that error with the 0.7.2 release. I'm
> using
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> the
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> latest
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> code
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> from subversion and I haven't seen the error
> again.
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Regards,
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  Diego
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Diego Woitasen
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >>> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wanproxy.org/pipermail/wanproxy-wanproxy.org/attachments/20111219/f479d61c/attachment-0005.htm>


More information about the wanproxy mailing list