Speed Up WAN Link..Ideas needed

Mon Dec 19 11:45:43 PST 2011

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:03, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> I have to note that I did do the testing with a partner at a different
> physical location. My Linux laptop with FF and Chrome did not cause a crash,
> his Chrome/FF and IE caused the crash. I will retest with him today and let
> you know results. What is better to use in terms of speed zlib or xcodec ?
> Regards

At this point I would suggest not disabling either one.  XCodec does
the deduplication that is at the heart of WAN Optimization — it
remembers chunks of data across many connections to reduce the amount
of data sent over the network.  zlib does ephemeral compression,
taking the output of XCodec and compressing it using a standard
compression algorithm.  The two work together quite well.  I would
like to track down and fix the crash you saw.

> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Neither of those errors is necessarily bad.  A lot of connections get
>> closed that way.  The thing about the deflate stream not ending neatly
>> is also not uncommon.  Were you able to access websites with that
>> configuration?  It's the crash that you saw earlier that concerns me
>> as long as everything else is working alright.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 15:38, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > My initial settings are same as the
>> >
>> > Proxying over a WAN using SOCKS
>> >
>> > Example, in this example Zlib is not enabled and I get the error
>> > mentioned
>> > in the last emails, upon disabling xcodec and enabling zlib as in the
>> > config
>> > example "only relevant top part" I get this error :
>> >
>> >
>> > Server
>> >
>> > create codec codec0
>> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
>> > #activate codec0
>> >
>> > set codec0.compressor zlib
>> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
>> > activate codec0
>> >
>> >
>> > Client
>> >
>> > create codec codec0
>> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
>> > #activate codec0
>> >
>> > set codec0.compressor zlib
>> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
>> > activate codec0
>> >
>> >
>> > I get this error :
>> > 1324250995.222191 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
>> > [Connection reset by peer]
>> > 1324250995.222342 [/zlib/deflate_pipe] ERR: virtual
>> > DeflatePipe::~DeflatePipe(): Deflate stream did not end cleanly.
>> >
>> > When I commented out the activate codec line using the same config
>> > copied
>> > above I got this error :
>> >
>> > 1324251200.589366 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
>> > [Connection reset by peer]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
>> >> Did svn up to 897 ..did make clean and called make, will update with
>> >> results, if I get errors will disable zlib and report back as well.
>> >> Regards
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I meant the binary on both the client and the server.
>> >>>
>> >>> To disable zlib, just comment out or remove the lines like these in
>> >>> each codec configuration.
>> >>>
>> >>> set codec0.compressor zlib
>> >>> set codec0.compressor_level 6
>> >>>
>> >>> But actually, it would probably be best for you to just update and
>> >>> rebuild without changing your configuration.  Just do "svn up" at the
>> >>> top level directory and do "make clean" and "make" in
>> >>> programs/wanproxy.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>> Juli.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 14:28, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Hi
>> >>> > First of all, let me express my appreciations for all the support
>> >>> > and
>> >>> > help,
>> >>> > Open source products are the result of collaboration between the
>> >>> > people
>> >>> > who
>> >>> > do the hard work like yourself, and people who make use of the
>> >>> > creativity/productivity of people like yourself, that would be me
>> >>> > :).
>> >>> > So I
>> >>> > do not mind doing some testing and debugging.
>> >>> > Having said that, you want me to make clean and make recompile at
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > trunk
>> >>> > level ? How to test without zlib/zcodec ? Removing parts of config ?
>> >>> > The
>> >>> > only binary I am using is wanproxy that I copied to /usr/sbin/ did I
>> >>> > miss
>> >>> > something here ? What is the second binary ?
>> >>> > Regards
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I thought I had fixed this problem.  You are using both zlib and
>> >>> >> xcodec, right?  I do not understand how this error could still be
>> >>> >> happening.  If you could try with only xcodec or only zlib, that
>> >>> >> might
>> >>> >> be helpful to me, so I know which component is in need of further
>> >>> >> testing.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Also, if you want to update the whole tree and rebuild both
>> >>> >> binaries,
>> >>> >> I've added some messages which should make it easier to tell which
>> >>> >> PipeProducer subclass is doing the wrong thing here.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Apologies for all the difficulty.  I want you to know that I have
>> >>> >> been
>> >>> >> testing this, and did originally see the problem you report here,
>> >>> >> but
>> >>> >> did find a way to fix it.  I have some work I need to do today that
>> >>> >> I
>> >>> >> do not want to disrupt, but I am hoping that later in my evening
>> >>> >> (I'm
>> >>> >> on the west coast of the US) I will be able to set up a few more
>> >>> >> systems to use in testing, and see if I can trigger this bug.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> > Hi
>> >>> >> > Client crashed when a page displayed flash, with following error
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > 1324214230.331051 [/assert] EMERG: void
>> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*):
>> >>> >> > Halting: Assertion (!output_eos_) failed at
>> >>> >> > ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in function void
>> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>> >>> >> > Aborted
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Regards
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Hi July
>> >>> >> >> I was able to make the connection work, it was a stupid mistake
>> >>> >> >> on
>> >>> >> >> my
>> >>> >> >> side, the errors are less and performance is slightly better but
>> >>> >> >> still
>> >>> >> >> slow
>> >>> >> >> I am getting these errors on client side now
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> 1324212755.168570 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >> 1324212756.652634 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >> 1324212776.041883 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >> 1324212777.468335 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> On server side I am getting
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> 1324184191.330804 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
>> >>> >> >> void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >> 1324184194.297132 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
>> >>> >> >> void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >> 1324184202.948238 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
>> >>> >> >> void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >> 1324184202.951848 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
>> >>> >> >> void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >> 1324184217.752559 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
>> >>> >> >> void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >> 1324184217.755806 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector] ERR:
>> >>> >> >> void
>> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Regards
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> Very strange.  Can you send the client and server
>> >>> >> >>> configurations?
>> >>> >> >>>  I'm
>> >>> >> >>> guessing that connect is failing because the ports are
>> >>> >> >>> mismatched
>> >>> >> >>> or
>> >>> >> >>> similar, but I can't be sure.  It would also be helpful if you
>> >>> >> >>> could
>> >>> >> >>> telnet from the client to the port the server is supposed to be
>> >>> >> >>> listening on, to verify that there are no firewalling issues
>> >>> >> >>> involved.
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 15:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> > Hi Juli
>> >>> >> >>> > Did checkout to version 895 on both machines and did the
>> >>> >> >>> > following
>> >>> >> >>> > on
>> >>> >> >>> > both
>> >>> >> >>> > machines as well , make clean in programs/wanproxy, make,
>> >>> >> >>> > copy
>> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
>> >>> >> >>> > file
>> >>> >> >>> > to /usr/sbin/ then launch
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> > /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c /etc/wanproxy.conf
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> > On the client I get
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337113 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/listener] INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> > Listening
>> >>> >> >>> > on:
>> >>> >> >>> > [0.0.0.0]:3300
>> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337732 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event
>> >>> >> >>> > thread.
>> >>> >> >>> > 1324163930.640914 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> > 1324163931.393061 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.144333 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.919439 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> > 1324163933.906755 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> > 1324163934.677630 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> > 1324163935.459671 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> > And the browser is not working when setting socks to use
>> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
>> >>> >> >>> > client.
>> >>> >> >>> > Anything I missed here ?
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> > Thanks
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >> Hi
>> >>> >> >>> >> The problem happened on the latest trunk that I donwload
>> >>> >> >>> >> just
>> >>> >> >>> >> after
>> >>> >> >>> >> your
>> >>> >> >>> >> latest email, I will checkout trunk, clean and make and send
>> >>> >> >>> >> output.
>> >>> >> >>> >> Thank agains
>> >>> >> >>> >> Regards
>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> First, update to latest trunk since I fixed the issues
>> >>> >> >>> >>> you've
>> >>> >> >>> >>> reported so
>> >>> >> >>> >>> far.
>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> Then could you go to programs/wanproxy on the client, "make
>> >>> >> >>> >>> clean",
>> >>> >> >>> >>> and then send all of the output of "make" to the list?
>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>> >> >>> >>> Juli.
>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:23, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > Hi Juli
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > Thanks for the continous help, I have one on the latest
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > trunk,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > but
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > client I get errors while compiling the trunk on, the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > problem is
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > related to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > this it seems  "result of make in programs/wanproxy/"
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> non-virtual
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> destructor
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’ has
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> virtual
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> functions
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> but non-virtual destructor
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Hi Ali,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks for pointing out the problems with
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -Wnon-virtual-dtor —
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> fixed
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> those just now.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> You need to have the client and server running the same
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> version.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  The
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> protocol has changed considerable from 0.7.2 to today,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> and
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> should
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> not mix the two.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> That said, I think you may have some other problem with
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> errors
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you're seeing; I don't think the mix of versions would
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> explain
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> it.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Still, if you would update both to trunk and report any
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> issues
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> encounter back, I'll try to fix them as soon as
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> possible.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  If
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> continue to experience issues, I'll set up a CentOS VM
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> test
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> everything myself before asking you to do so again.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Sorry about the continued difficulty.  I usually try
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> very
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> hard
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> make
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> sure users have a seamless experience of building and
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> using
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> WANProxy.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Once this is all resolved, I'll put out a release
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> tarball,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> too.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Juli.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 05:44, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Right now using latest trunk for server, and latest
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > tgz
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > for
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > client
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  I am
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > getting this error
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [root at CentOS54 programs]# /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  /etc/wanproxy.conf
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.168662 [/wanproxy] INFO: WANProxy 0.7.2
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.169621 [/wanproxy] INFO: Copyright (c)
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 2008-2011
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.org.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.170510 [/wanproxy] INFO: All rights
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > reserved.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.171419 [/wanproxy/config] INFO: Configuring
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173140 [/io/system] INFO: Starting IO
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > system.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173861 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > thread.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.092574 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.895308 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129320.699028 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129321.499178 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> If I go to the programs/wanproxy and just make there
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> get
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> non-virtual
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> destructor
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> has
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> virtual
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> functions
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> but non-virtual destructor
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Juli Mallett
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Hi Ali,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> The problems you encountered should be fixed in
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Subversion.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Can
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> please provide the errors you encountered?  Most
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> commonly,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> problem
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> is missing libuuid-dev or similar package, at least
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> on
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Linux
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> systems.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Thanks!
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Juli.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:56, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Hi
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > I tried to install latest src code but did only
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > run
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > in to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > during compiling, but 0.7.2 did not face any
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > issues,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > did
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > face
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems with websites opening during that error ?
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Regards
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Diego Woitasen
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > <diego at woitasen.com.ar>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Juli Mallett
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Ali,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 13:08, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> and on the client I am getting
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524646.018556
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ERR:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event):
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Unexpected
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> event:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <Error>/32
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [Broken pipe]
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524690.407944 [/assert] EMERG: void
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*): Halting:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Assertion
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> (!output_eos_)
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed at ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> function
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Aborted
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks.  Several other users have reported this,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> but I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> have
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> not
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> been
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> able to reproduce it.  I will redouble my
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> efforts
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> reproduce.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Hi
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Browsers are FF 4.x and 3.x on Windows and
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Linux,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> also
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tried
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> IE8,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the config is the same one given in the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> examples,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> OS
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> is
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> CentOS
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 5.6
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 64bit.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Regards
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks for the feedback.  I don't think I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> will
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> access,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> may
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need more configuration information to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> reproduce.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> OS
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> WANProxy
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> running on?  Can you send your configuration?
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> browser
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> client?
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks!
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 13:44, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Hi
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the help so far, I might be able
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> give
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> access
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> check it out if needed, as for now no IPV6,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> sites
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> like
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> cnn
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> youtube etc
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Juli
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Mallett
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> This seems very strange.  Which sites?  Do
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> have
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv6
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> connectivity?
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you don't have IPv6 connectivity, I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wonder
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> if
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> that
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> might
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> be
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> problem, and we might need some way to tell
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> WANProxy
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> use
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv4
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> only.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you have specific examples that likely
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> will
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> make
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> it
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> easier
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> for me
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to reproduce and fix.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks & sorry to hear about your
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> difficulty,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Juli.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:04, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Hi
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I completed the setup, but some sites open
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sites
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> need to be reloaded a few times for it to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> work,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I.e.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> CSS
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> does
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not load
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> etc.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas ?
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Regards
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Mallett
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ali,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you already have the SOCKS example
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configured,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> then
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> should be
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> able to use your browser or operating
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> system's
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> proxy
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configuration to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell it to use SOCKS for HTTP or FTP or
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> whatever
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> protocols
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> need.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have trouble finding this and tell
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> what
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> OS
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> browser or
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> other software you're using I'm sure one
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> of
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> can
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> help
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> get the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> information you need!
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Juli.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 03:26, Ali Jawad
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did setup wanproxy in client/server
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> mode
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> as
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> per
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Proxying over a
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN using SOCKS example in
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://wanproxy.org/examples.shtml
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> . Here
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is the issue
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do have a server in Asia which is the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> and
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> a
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in the USA
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> which is the wanproxy server, I want
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> traffic
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> for
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsing
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through the wanproxy link and from there
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> fetch
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sites I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need in
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the states and send them back after that
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> link
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client server which sends them to the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browser
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in my LAN.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is this something WAN proxy does ? Do I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need to
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> do
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> additional
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> stuff ?
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Such as setting up SQUID on wanproxy
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> or
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Is any
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ip forwarding needed ? What
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> should I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> use
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsers
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ?
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry for the long list of
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> questions,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> but
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> am
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sure
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> will come
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in handy for people who research the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> topic
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> online
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> "once
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> answered that
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is :)"
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy mailing list
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy mailing list
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Hi,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  I had that error with the 0.7.2 release. I'm
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> using
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> latest
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> code
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> from subversion and I haven't seen the error
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> again.
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Regards,
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  Diego
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Diego Woitasen
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>
>