Speed Up WAN Link..Ideas needed

Mon Dec 19 15:55:11 PST 2011

Hi Juli
I will certainly try to track down the crash by using each codec alone and
both together and none, having said that can you please post a config
example of both working together, the example I am using from the site only
makes use of xcodec, I was able to use zlib but I am not sure how to
combine both to work. Another thing is that some of the users have
ipads/iphones and other devices that are not SOCKS friendly, any
suggestions on how to allow those devices to utilize the enhanced WAN link
?
Regards

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:03, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> > I have to note that I did do the testing with a partner at a different
> > physical location. My Linux laptop with FF and Chrome did not cause a
> crash,
> > his Chrome/FF and IE caused the crash. I will retest with him today and
> let
> > you know results. What is better to use in terms of speed zlib or xcodec
> ?
> > Regards
>
> At this point I would suggest not disabling either one.  XCodec does
> the deduplication that is at the heart of WAN Optimization — it
> remembers chunks of data across many connections to reduce the amount
> of data sent over the network.  zlib does ephemeral compression,
> taking the output of XCodec and compressing it using a standard
> compression algorithm.  The two work together quite well.  I would
> like to track down and fix the crash you saw.
>
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Neither of those errors is necessarily bad.  A lot of connections get
> >> closed that way.  The thing about the deflate stream not ending neatly
> >> is also not uncommon.  Were you able to access websites with that
> >> configuration?  It's the crash that you saw earlier that concerns me
> >> as long as everything else is working alright.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 15:38, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> > My initial settings are same as the
> >> >
> >> > Proxying over a WAN using SOCKS
> >> >
> >> > Example, in this example Zlib is not enabled and I get the error
> >> > mentioned
> >> > in the last emails, upon disabling xcodec and enabling zlib as in the
> >> > config
> >> > example "only relevant top part" I get this error :
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Server
> >> >
> >> > create codec codec0
> >> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
> >> > #activate codec0
> >> >
> >> > set codec0.compressor zlib
> >> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
> >> > activate codec0
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Client
> >> >
> >> > create codec codec0
> >> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
> >> > #activate codec0
> >> >
> >> > set codec0.compressor zlib
> >> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
> >> > activate codec0
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I get this error :
> >> > 1324250995.222191 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> > [Connection reset by peer]
> >> > 1324250995.222342 [/zlib/deflate_pipe] ERR: virtual
> >> > DeflatePipe::~DeflatePipe(): Deflate stream did not end cleanly.
> >> >
> >> > When I commented out the activate codec line using the same config
> >> > copied
> >> > above I got this error :
> >> >
> >> > 1324251200.589366 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
> >> > [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi
> >> >> Did svn up to 897 ..did make clean and called make, will update with
> >> >> results, if I get errors will disable zlib and report back as well.
> >> >> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Juli Mallett <
> juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I meant the binary on both the client and the server.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> To disable zlib, just comment out or remove the lines like these in
> >> >>> each codec configuration.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> set codec0.compressor zlib
> >> >>> set codec0.compressor_level 6
> >> >>>
> >> >>> But actually, it would probably be best for you to just update and
> >> >>> rebuild without changing your configuration.  Just do "svn up" at
> the
> >> >>> top level directory and do "make clean" and "make" in
> >> >>> programs/wanproxy.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks!
> >> >>> Juli.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 14:28, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>> > Hi
> >> >>> > First of all, let me express my appreciations for all the support
> >> >>> > and
> >> >>> > help,
> >> >>> > Open source products are the result of collaboration between the
> >> >>> > people
> >> >>> > who
> >> >>> > do the hard work like yourself, and people who make use of the
> >> >>> > creativity/productivity of people like yourself, that would be me
> >> >>> > :).
> >> >>> > So I
> >> >>> > do not mind doing some testing and debugging.
> >> >>> > Having said that, you want me to make clean and make recompile at
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > trunk
> >> >>> > level ? How to test without zlib/zcodec ? Removing parts of
> config ?
> >> >>> > The
> >> >>> > only binary I am using is wanproxy that I copied to /usr/sbin/
> did I
> >> >>> > miss
> >> >>> > something here ? What is the second binary ?
> >> >>> > Regards
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> I thought I had fixed this problem.  You are using both zlib and
> >> >>> >> xcodec, right?  I do not understand how this error could still be
> >> >>> >> happening.  If you could try with only xcodec or only zlib, that
> >> >>> >> might
> >> >>> >> be helpful to me, so I know which component is in need of further
> >> >>> >> testing.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Also, if you want to update the whole tree and rebuild both
> >> >>> >> binaries,
> >> >>> >> I've added some messages which should make it easier to tell
> which
> >> >>> >> PipeProducer subclass is doing the wrong thing here.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Apologies for all the difficulty.  I want you to know that I have
> >> >>> >> been
> >> >>> >> testing this, and did originally see the problem you report here,
> >> >>> >> but
> >> >>> >> did find a way to fix it.  I have some work I need to do today
> that
> >> >>> >> I
> >> >>> >> do not want to disrupt, but I am hoping that later in my evening
> >> >>> >> (I'm
> >> >>> >> on the west coast of the US) I will be able to set up a few more
> >> >>> >> systems to use in testing, and see if I can trigger this bug.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> > Hi
> >> >>> >> > Client crashed when a page displayed flash, with following
> error
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > 1324214230.331051 [/assert] EMERG: void
> >> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*):
> >> >>> >> > Halting: Assertion (!output_eos_) failed at
> >> >>> >> > ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in function void
> >> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
> >> >>> >> > Aborted
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Regards
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Ali Jawad <
> alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Hi July
> >> >>> >> >> I was able to make the connection work, it was a stupid
> mistake
> >> >>> >> >> on
> >> >>> >> >> my
> >> >>> >> >> side, the errors are less and performance is slightly better
> but
> >> >>> >> >> still
> >> >>> >> >> slow
> >> >>> >> >> I am getting these errors on client side now
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> 1324212755.168570 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >> 1324212756.652634 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >> 1324212776.041883 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >> 1324212777.468335 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> On server side I am getting
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> 1324184191.330804 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
> ERR:
> >> >>> >> >> void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >> 1324184194.297132 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
> ERR:
> >> >>> >> >> void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >> 1324184202.948238 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
> ERR:
> >> >>> >> >> void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >> 1324184202.951848 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
> ERR:
> >> >>> >> >> void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >> 1324184217.752559 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
> ERR:
> >> >>> >> >> void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >> 1324184217.755806 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
> ERR:
> >> >>> >> >> void
> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Regards
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> Very strange.  Can you send the client and server
> >> >>> >> >>> configurations?
> >> >>> >> >>>  I'm
> >> >>> >> >>> guessing that connect is failing because the ports are
> >> >>> >> >>> mismatched
> >> >>> >> >>> or
> >> >>> >> >>> similar, but I can't be sure.  It would also be helpful if
> you
> >> >>> >> >>> could
> >> >>> >> >>> telnet from the client to the port the server is supposed to
> be
> >> >>> >> >>> listening on, to verify that there are no firewalling issues
> >> >>> >> >>> involved.
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 15:21, Ali Jawad <
> alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> > Hi Juli
> >> >>> >> >>> > Did checkout to version 895 on both machines and did the
> >> >>> >> >>> > following
> >> >>> >> >>> > on
> >> >>> >> >>> > both
> >> >>> >> >>> > machines as well , make clean in programs/wanproxy, make,
> >> >>> >> >>> > copy
> >> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
> >> >>> >> >>> > file
> >> >>> >> >>> > to /usr/sbin/ then launch
> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> > /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c /etc/wanproxy.conf
> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> > On the client I get
> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337113 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/listener] INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> > Listening
> >> >>> >> >>> > on:
> >> >>> >> >>> > [0.0.0.0]:3300
> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337732 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event
> >> >>> >> >>> > thread.
> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163930.640914 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163931.393061 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.144333 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.919439 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163933.906755 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163934.677630 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163935.459671 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> > And the browser is not working when setting socks to use
> >> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
> >> >>> >> >>> > client.
> >> >>> >> >>> > Anything I missed here ?
> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> > Thanks
> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >> Hi
> >> >>> >> >>> >> The problem happened on the latest trunk that I donwload
> >> >>> >> >>> >> just
> >> >>> >> >>> >> after
> >> >>> >> >>> >> your
> >> >>> >> >>> >> latest email, I will checkout trunk, clean and make and
> send
> >> >>> >> >>> >> output.
> >> >>> >> >>> >> Thank agains
> >> >>> >> >>> >> Regards
> >> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> First, update to latest trunk since I fixed the issues
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> you've
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> reported so
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> far.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Then could you go to programs/wanproxy on the client,
> "make
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> clean",
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> and then send all of the output of "make" to the list?
> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Juli.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:23, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > Hi Juli
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > Thanks for the continous help, I have one on the latest
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > trunk,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > but
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > client I get errors while compiling the trunk on, the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > problem is
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > related to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > this it seems  "result of make in programs/wanproxy/"
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> non-virtual
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> destructor
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’
> has
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> virtual
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> functions
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> but non-virtual destructor
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Hi Ali,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks for pointing out the problems with
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -Wnon-virtual-dtor —
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> fixed
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> those just now.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> You need to have the client and server running the
> same
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> version.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  The
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> protocol has changed considerable from 0.7.2 to today,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> and
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> should
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> not mix the two.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> That said, I think you may have some other problem
> with
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> errors
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you're seeing; I don't think the mix of versions would
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> explain
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> it.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Still, if you would update both to trunk and report
> any
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> issues
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> encounter back, I'll try to fix them as soon as
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> possible.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  If
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> continue to experience issues, I'll set up a CentOS VM
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> test
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> everything myself before asking you to do so again.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Sorry about the continued difficulty.  I usually try
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> very
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> hard
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> make
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> sure users have a seamless experience of building and
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> using
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> WANProxy.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Once this is all resolved, I'll put out a release
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> tarball,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> too.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Juli.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 05:44, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Right now using latest trunk for server, and latest
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > tgz
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > for
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > client
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  I am
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > getting this error
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [root at CentOS54 programs]# /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  /etc/wanproxy.conf
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.168662 [/wanproxy] INFO: WANProxy 0.7.2
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.169621 [/wanproxy] INFO: Copyright (c)
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 2008-2011
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.org.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.170510 [/wanproxy] INFO: All rights
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > reserved.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.171419 [/wanproxy/config] INFO:
> Configuring
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173140 [/io/system] INFO: Starting IO
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > system.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173861 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting
> event
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > thread.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.092574 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.895308 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129320.699028 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129321.499178 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> If I go to the programs/wanproxy and just make
> there
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> get
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation
> of
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> non-virtual
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> destructor
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> has
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> virtual
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> functions
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> but non-virtual destructor
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Hi Ali,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> The problems you encountered should be fixed in
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Subversion.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Can
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> please provide the errors you encountered?  Most
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> commonly,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> problem
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> is missing libuuid-dev or similar package, at
> least
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> on
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Linux
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> systems.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Thanks!
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Juli.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:56, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Hi
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > I tried to install latest src code but did only
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > run
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > in to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > during compiling, but 0.7.2 did not face any
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > issues,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > did
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > face
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems with websites opening during that
> error ?
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Regards
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Diego Woitasen
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > <diego at woitasen.com.ar>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Juli Mallett
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Ali,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 13:08, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> and on the client I am getting
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524646.018556
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ERR:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event):
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Unexpected
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> event:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <Error>/32
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [Broken pipe]
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524690.407944 [/assert] EMERG: void
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*): Halting:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Assertion
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> (!output_eos_)
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed at ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109
> in
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> function
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Aborted
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks.  Several other users have reported
> this,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> but I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> have
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> not
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> been
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> able to reproduce it.  I will redouble my
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> efforts
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> reproduce.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Hi
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Browsers are FF 4.x and 3.x on Windows and
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Linux,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> also
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tried
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> IE8,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the config is the same one given in the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> examples,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> OS
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> is
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> CentOS
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 5.6
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 64bit.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Regards
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Juli
> Mallett
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks for the feedback.  I don't think I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> will
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> access,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> may
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need more configuration information to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> reproduce.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> OS
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> WANProxy
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> running on?  Can you send your
> configuration?
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> browser
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> client?
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks!
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 13:44, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Hi
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the help so far, I might be
> able
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> give
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> access
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> check it out if needed, as for now no
> IPV6,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> sites
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> like
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> cnn
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> youtube etc
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Juli
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Mallett
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> This seems very strange.  Which sites?
>  Do
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> have
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv6
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> connectivity?
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you don't have IPv6 connectivity, I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wonder
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> if
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> that
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> might
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> be
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> problem, and we might need some way to
> tell
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> WANProxy
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> use
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv4
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> only.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you have specific examples that
> likely
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> will
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> make
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> it
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> easier
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> for me
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to reproduce and fix.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks & sorry to hear about your
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> difficulty,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Juli.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:04, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Hi
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I completed the setup, but some sites
> open
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> and
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sites
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> need to be reloaded a few times for it
> to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> work,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I.e.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> CSS
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> does
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not load
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> etc.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas ?
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Regards
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Mallett
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ali,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you already have the SOCKS example
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configured,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> then
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> should be
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> able to use your browser or operating
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> system's
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> proxy
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configuration to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell it to use SOCKS for HTTP or FTP or
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> whatever
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> protocols
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> need.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have trouble finding this and
> tell
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> what
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> OS
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> browser or
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> other software you're using I'm sure
> one
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> can
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> help
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> get the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> information you need!
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Juli.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 03:26, Ali Jawad
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did setup wanproxy in client/server
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> mode
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> as
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> per
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Proxying over a
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN using SOCKS example in
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://wanproxy.org/examples.shtml
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> . Here
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is the issue
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do have a server in Asia which is
> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> a
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in the USA
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> which is the wanproxy server, I want
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> traffic
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> for
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsing
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through the wanproxy link and from
> there
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> fetch
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sites I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need in
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the states and send them back after
> that
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> link
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client server which sends them to the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browser
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in my LAN.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is this something WAN proxy does ? Do
> I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need to
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> do
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> additional
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> stuff ?
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Such as setting up SQUID on wanproxy
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> or
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Is any
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ip forwarding needed ? What
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> configuration
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> should I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> use
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsers
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ?
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry for the long list of
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> questions,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> but
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> am
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> will come
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in handy for people who research the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> topic
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> online
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> "once
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> answered that
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is :)"
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy mailing list
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy mailing list
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Hi,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  I had that error with the 0.7.2 release. I'm
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> using
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> the
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> latest
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> code
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> from subversion and I haven't seen the error
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> again.
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Regards,
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  Diego
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Diego Woitasen
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wanproxy.org/pipermail/wanproxy-wanproxy.org/attachments/20111220/4858f519/attachment-0005.htm>