Speed Up WAN Link..Ideas needed

Thu Dec 22 16:18:15 PST 2011

Can you paste all of the output of the client up to and including the
crash?  The failed assertion message should have changed to give me a
better idea of where the problem is.

Thanks,
Juli.

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 13:53, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Juli
> Any other info I can provide ?
> Thanks
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Juli
>> I did try different codecs and monitored the client and server, the
>> problem happens with xcodec after leaving it on for a while the client
>> crashes, when I start it and browse anything it just keeps crashing. This
>> stops to happen when I restart wanproxy on the server.
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Juli
>>> I will certainly try to track down the crash by using each codec alone
>>> and both together and none, having said that can you please post a config
>>> example of both working together, the example I am using from the site only
>>> makes use of xcodec, I was able to use zlib but I am not sure how to combine
>>> both to work. Another thing is that some of the users have ipads/iphones and
>>> other devices that are not SOCKS friendly, any suggestions on how to allow
>>> those devices to utilize the enhanced WAN link ?
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:03, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi
>>>> > I have to note that I did do the testing with a partner at a different
>>>> > physical location. My Linux laptop with FF and Chrome did not cause a
>>>> > crash,
>>>> > his Chrome/FF and IE caused the crash. I will retest with him today
>>>> > and let
>>>> > you know results. What is better to use in terms of speed zlib or
>>>> > xcodec ?
>>>> > Regards
>>>>
>>>> At this point I would suggest not disabling either one.  XCodec does
>>>> the deduplication that is at the heart of WAN Optimization — it
>>>> remembers chunks of data across many connections to reduce the amount
>>>> of data sent over the network.  zlib does ephemeral compression,
>>>> taking the output of XCodec and compressing it using a standard
>>>> compression algorithm.  The two work together quite well.  I would
>>>> like to track down and fix the crash you saw.
>>>>
>>>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Juli Mallett
>>>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Neither of those errors is necessarily bad.  A lot of connections get
>>>> >> closed that way.  The thing about the deflate stream not ending
>>>> >> neatly
>>>> >> is also not uncommon.  Were you able to access websites with that
>>>> >> configuration?  It's the crash that you saw earlier that concerns me
>>>> >> as long as everything else is working alright.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 15:38, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > Hi
>>>> >> > My initial settings are same as the
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Proxying over a WAN using SOCKS
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Example, in this example Zlib is not enabled and I get the error
>>>> >> > mentioned
>>>> >> > in the last emails, upon disabling xcodec and enabling zlib as in
>>>> >> > the
>>>> >> > config
>>>> >> > example "only relevant top part" I get this error :
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Server
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > create codec codec0
>>>> >> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
>>>> >> > #activate codec0
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > set codec0.compressor zlib
>>>> >> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
>>>> >> > activate codec0
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Client
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > create codec codec0
>>>> >> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
>>>> >> > #activate codec0
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > set codec0.compressor zlib
>>>> >> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
>>>> >> > activate codec0
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > I get this error :
>>>> >> > 1324250995.222191 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>>>> >> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> > <Error>/104
>>>> >> > [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> > 1324250995.222342 [/zlib/deflate_pipe] ERR: virtual
>>>> >> > DeflatePipe::~DeflatePipe(): Deflate stream did not end cleanly.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > When I commented out the activate codec line using the same config
>>>> >> > copied
>>>> >> > above I got this error :
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > 1324251200.589366 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>>>> >> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> > <Error>/104
>>>> >> > [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Hi
>>>> >> >> Did svn up to 897 ..did make clean and called make, will update
>>>> >> >> with
>>>> >> >> results, if I get errors will disable zlib and report back as
>>>> >> >> well.
>>>> >> >> Regards
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Juli Mallett
>>>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> I meant the binary on both the client and the server.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> To disable zlib, just comment out or remove the lines like these
>>>> >> >>> in
>>>> >> >>> each codec configuration.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> set codec0.compressor zlib
>>>> >> >>> set codec0.compressor_level 6
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> But actually, it would probably be best for you to just update
>>>> >> >>> and
>>>> >> >>> rebuild without changing your configuration.  Just do "svn up" at
>>>> >> >>> the
>>>> >> >>> top level directory and do "make clean" and "make" in
>>>> >> >>> programs/wanproxy.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> Thanks!
>>>> >> >>> Juli.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 14:28, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> > Hi
>>>> >> >>> > First of all, let me express my appreciations for all the
>>>> >> >>> > support
>>>> >> >>> > and
>>>> >> >>> > help,
>>>> >> >>> > Open source products are the result of collaboration between
>>>> >> >>> > the
>>>> >> >>> > people
>>>> >> >>> > who
>>>> >> >>> > do the hard work like yourself, and people who make use of the
>>>> >> >>> > creativity/productivity of people like yourself, that would be
>>>> >> >>> > me
>>>> >> >>> > :).
>>>> >> >>> > So I
>>>> >> >>> > do not mind doing some testing and debugging.
>>>> >> >>> > Having said that, you want me to make clean and make recompile
>>>> >> >>> > at
>>>> >> >>> > the
>>>> >> >>> > trunk
>>>> >> >>> > level ? How to test without zlib/zcodec ? Removing parts of
>>>> >> >>> > config ?
>>>> >> >>> > The
>>>> >> >>> > only binary I am using is wanproxy that I copied to /usr/sbin/
>>>> >> >>> > did I
>>>> >> >>> > miss
>>>> >> >>> > something here ? What is the second binary ?
>>>> >> >>> > Regards
>>>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Juli Mallett
>>>> >> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>>>> >> >>> > wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> I thought I had fixed this problem.  You are using both zlib
>>>> >> >>> >> and
>>>> >> >>> >> xcodec, right?  I do not understand how this error could still
>>>> >> >>> >> be
>>>> >> >>> >> happening.  If you could try with only xcodec or only zlib,
>>>> >> >>> >> that
>>>> >> >>> >> might
>>>> >> >>> >> be helpful to me, so I know which component is in need of
>>>> >> >>> >> further
>>>> >> >>> >> testing.
>>>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> Also, if you want to update the whole tree and rebuild both
>>>> >> >>> >> binaries,
>>>> >> >>> >> I've added some messages which should make it easier to tell
>>>> >> >>> >> which
>>>> >> >>> >> PipeProducer subclass is doing the wrong thing here.
>>>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> Apologies for all the difficulty.  I want you to know that I
>>>> >> >>> >> have
>>>> >> >>> >> been
>>>> >> >>> >> testing this, and did originally see the problem you report
>>>> >> >>> >> here,
>>>> >> >>> >> but
>>>> >> >>> >> did find a way to fix it.  I have some work I need to do today
>>>> >> >>> >> that
>>>> >> >>> >> I
>>>> >> >>> >> do not want to disrupt, but I am hoping that later in my
>>>> >> >>> >> evening
>>>> >> >>> >> (I'm
>>>> >> >>> >> on the west coast of the US) I will be able to set up a few
>>>> >> >>> >> more
>>>> >> >>> >> systems to use in testing, and see if I can trigger this bug.
>>>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> > Hi
>>>> >> >>> >> > Client crashed when a page displayed flash, with following
>>>> >> >>> >> > error
>>>> >> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >>> >> > 1324214230.331051 [/assert] EMERG: void
>>>> >> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*):
>>>> >> >>> >> > Halting: Assertion (!output_eos_) failed at
>>>> >> >>> >> > ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in function void
>>>> >> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>>>> >> >>> >> > Aborted
>>>> >> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >>> >> > Regards
>>>> >> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >>> >> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >> Hi July
>>>> >> >>> >> >> I was able to make the connection work, it was a stupid
>>>> >> >>> >> >> mistake
>>>> >> >>> >> >> on
>>>> >> >>> >> >> my
>>>> >> >>> >> >> side, the errors are less and performance is slightly
>>>> >> >>> >> >> better but
>>>> >> >>> >> >> still
>>>> >> >>> >> >> slow
>>>> >> >>> >> >> I am getting these errors on client side now
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212755.168570 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212756.652634 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212776.041883 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212777.468335 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >> On server side I am getting
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184191.330804 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184194.297132 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184202.948238 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184202.951848 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184217.752559 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184217.755806 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >> Regards
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Juli Mallett
>>>> >> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> Very strange.  Can you send the client and server
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> configurations?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>>  I'm
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> guessing that connect is failing because the ports are
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> mismatched
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> or
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> similar, but I can't be sure.  It would also be helpful if
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> could
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> telnet from the client to the port the server is supposed
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> to be
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> listening on, to verify that there are no firewalling
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> issues
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> involved.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 15:21, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Hi Juli
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Did checkout to version 895 on both machines and did the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > following
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > on
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > both
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > machines as well , make clean in programs/wanproxy,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > make,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > copy
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > file
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > to /usr/sbin/ then launch
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c /etc/wanproxy.conf
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > On the client I get
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337113 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/listener]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Listening
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > on:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > [0.0.0.0]:3300
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337732 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > thread.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163930.640914 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163931.393061 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.144333 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.919439 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163933.906755 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163934.677630 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163935.459671 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > And the browser is not working when setting socks to use
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > client.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Anything I missed here ?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Thanks
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Hi
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> The problem happened on the latest trunk that I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> donwload
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> just
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> after
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> your
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> latest email, I will checkout trunk, clean and make and
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> send
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> output.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Thank agains
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Regards
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> First, update to latest trunk since I fixed the issues
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> you've
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> reported so
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> far.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Then could you go to programs/wanproxy on the client,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> "make
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> clean",
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> and then send all of the output of "make" to the list?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Juli.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:23, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > Hi Juli
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > Thanks for the continous help, I have one on the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > latest
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > trunk,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > but
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > client I get errors while compiling the trunk on,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > problem is
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > related to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > this it seems  "result of make in
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > programs/wanproxy/"
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> of
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘class
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> non-virtual
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> destructor
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ProxyListener’ has
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> virtual
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> functions
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> but non-virtual destructor
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Juli Mallett
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Hi Ali,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks for pointing out the problems with
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -Wnon-virtual-dtor —
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> fixed
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> those just now.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> You need to have the client and server running the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> same
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> version.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  The
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> protocol has changed considerable from 0.7.2 to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> today,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> and
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> should
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> not mix the two.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> That said, I think you may have some other problem
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> with
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> errors
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you're seeing; I don't think the mix of versions
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> would
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> explain
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> it.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Still, if you would update both to trunk and report
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> any
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> issues
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> encounter back, I'll try to fix them as soon as
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> possible.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  If
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> continue to experience issues, I'll set up a CentOS
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> VM
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> test
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> everything myself before asking you to do so again.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Sorry about the continued difficulty.  I usually
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> try
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> very
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> hard
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> make
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> sure users have a seamless experience of building
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> and
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> using
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> WANProxy.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Once this is all resolved, I'll put out a release
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> tarball,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> too.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Juli.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 05:44, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Right now using latest trunk for server, and
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > latest
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > tgz
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > for
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > client
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  I am
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > getting this error
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [root at CentOS54 programs]# /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  /etc/wanproxy.conf
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.168662 [/wanproxy] INFO: WANProxy
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 0.7.2
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.169621 [/wanproxy] INFO: Copyright (c)
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 2008-2011
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.org.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.170510 [/wanproxy] INFO: All rights
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > reserved.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.171419 [/wanproxy/config] INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Configuring
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173140 [/io/system] INFO: Starting IO
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > system.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173861 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > event
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > thread.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.092574
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.895308
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129320.699028
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129321.499178
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> If I go to the programs/wanproxy and just make
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> there
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> get
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> instantiation of
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘class
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> but
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> non-virtual
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> destructor
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ProxyListener’
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> has
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> virtual
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> functions
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> but non-virtual destructor
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Juli Mallett
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Hi Ali,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> The problems you encountered should be fixed in
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Subversion.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Can
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> please provide the errors you encountered?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Most
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> commonly,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> problem
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> is missing libuuid-dev or similar package, at
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> least
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> on
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Linux
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> systems.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Thanks!
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Juli.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:56, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Hi
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > I tried to install latest src code but did
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > only
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > run
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > in to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > during compiling, but 0.7.2 did not face any
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > issues,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > did
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > face
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems with websites opening during that
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > error ?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Regards
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Diego
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Woitasen
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > <diego at woitasen.com.ar>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Juli
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Mallett
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Ali,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 13:08, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> and on the client I am getting
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524646.018556
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ERR:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event):
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Unexpected
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> event:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <Error>/32
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [Broken pipe]
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524690.407944 [/assert] EMERG: void
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*): Halting:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Assertion
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> (!output_eos_)
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed at
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> function
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Aborted
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks.  Several other users have reported
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> this,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> but I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> have
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> not
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> been
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> able to reproduce it.  I will redouble my
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> efforts
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> reproduce.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Hi
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Browsers are FF 4.x and 3.x on Windows
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> and
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Linux,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> also
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tried
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> IE8,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the config is the same one given in the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> examples,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> OS
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> is
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> CentOS
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 5.6
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 64bit.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Regards
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Juli
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Mallett
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks for the feedback.  I don't think
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> will
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> access,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> may
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need more configuration information to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> reproduce.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> OS
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> WANProxy
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> running on?  Can you send your
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> configuration?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> browser
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> client?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks!
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 13:44, Ali Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Hi
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the help so far, I might be
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> able
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> give
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> access
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> check it out if needed, as for now no
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> IPV6,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> sites
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> like
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> cnn
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> youtube etc
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Juli
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Mallett
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> This seems very strange.  Which sites?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  Do
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> have
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv6
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> connectivity?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you don't have IPv6 connectivity,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wonder
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> if
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> that
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> might
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> be
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> problem, and we might need some way to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> tell
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> WANProxy
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> use
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv4
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> only.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you have specific examples that
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> likely
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> will
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> make
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> it
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> easier
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> for me
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to reproduce and fix.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks & sorry to hear about your
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> difficulty,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Juli.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:04, Ali
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I completed the setup, but some sites
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> open
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> and
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sites
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> need to be reloaded a few times for
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> it to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> work,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I.e.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> CSS
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> does
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not load
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas ?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Mallett
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ali,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you already have the SOCKS
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> example
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configured,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> then
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> able to use your browser or
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> operating
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> system's
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> proxy
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configuration to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell it to use SOCKS for HTTP or FTP
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> or
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> whatever
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> protocols
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> need.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have trouble finding this and
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> what
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> OS
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> browser or
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> other software you're using I'm sure
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> one
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> of
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> can
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> help
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> get the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> information you need!
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Juli.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 03:26, Ali
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Jawad
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did setup wanproxy in
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client/server
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> mode
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> per
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Proxying over a
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN using SOCKS example in
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://wanproxy.org/examples.shtml
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> . Here
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is the issue
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do have a server in Asia which is
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in the USA
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> which is the wanproxy server, I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> traffic
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsing
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through the wanproxy link and from
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> fetch
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sites I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need in
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the states and send them back after
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> link
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client server which sends them to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browser
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in my LAN.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is this something WAN proxy does ?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need to
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> additional
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> stuff ?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Such as setting up SQUID on
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Is any
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ip forwarding needed ? What
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsers
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry for the long list of
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> questions,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> will come
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in handy for people who research
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> topic
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> online
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> "once
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> answered that
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is :)"
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy mailing list
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy mailing list
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Hi,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  I had that error with the 0.7.2 release.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> I'm
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> using
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> the
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> latest
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> code
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> from subversion and I haven't seen the error
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> again.
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Regards,
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  Diego
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Diego Woitasen
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>