Speed Up WAN Link..Ideas needed

Sat Dec 24 13:05:12 PST 2011

Yes, but it depends what shell you're using.  I use csh, in which I
would do something like this; you can find something similar for
"output redirection" or "standard error redirection" pretty easily
with Google for your shell, I think.

wanproxy -v -c wanproxy.conf |& tee -a wanproxy.log

(The tee command makes data go both to your terminal and to that log
file.  That's a simplification of what it does, but close enough.
Using -a tells it to append to the wanproxy.log file if it already
exists.)

On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 12:51, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> I did SVN up and compile Rev. 907. I did start it and will report once it
> crashes, one question though, I am running wanproxy in screen "screen
> program" is there a way I can pipe output to log.
> Thanks and Merry Christmas !!
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Can you paste all of the output of the client up to and including the
>> crash?  The failed assertion message should have changed to give me a
>> better idea of where the problem is.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Juli.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 13:53, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Juli
>> > Any other info I can provide ?
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Juli
>> >> I did try different codecs and monitored the client and server, the
>> >> problem happens with xcodec after leaving it on for a while the client
>> >> crashes, when I start it and browse anything it just keeps crashing.
>> >> This
>> >> stops to happen when I restart wanproxy on the server.
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Juli
>> >>> I will certainly try to track down the crash by using each codec alone
>> >>> and both together and none, having said that can you please post a
>> >>> config
>> >>> example of both working together, the example I am using from the site
>> >>> only
>> >>> makes use of xcodec, I was able to use zlib but I am not sure how to
>> >>> combine
>> >>> both to work. Another thing is that some of the users have
>> >>> ipads/iphones and
>> >>> other devices that are not SOCKS friendly, any suggestions on how to
>> >>> allow
>> >>> those devices to utilize the enhanced WAN link ?
>> >>> Regards
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Juli Mallett
>> >>> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:03, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> > Hi
>> >>>> > I have to note that I did do the testing with a partner at a
>> >>>> > different
>> >>>> > physical location. My Linux laptop with FF and Chrome did not cause
>> >>>> > a
>> >>>> > crash,
>> >>>> > his Chrome/FF and IE caused the crash. I will retest with him today
>> >>>> > and let
>> >>>> > you know results. What is better to use in terms of speed zlib or
>> >>>> > xcodec ?
>> >>>> > Regards
>> >>>>
>> >>>> At this point I would suggest not disabling either one.  XCodec does
>> >>>> the deduplication that is at the heart of WAN Optimization — it
>> >>>> remembers chunks of data across many connections to reduce the amount
>> >>>> of data sent over the network.  zlib does ephemeral compression,
>> >>>> taking the output of XCodec and compressing it using a standard
>> >>>> compression algorithm.  The two work together quite well.  I would
>> >>>> like to track down and fix the crash you saw.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>>> > wrote:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Neither of those errors is necessarily bad.  A lot of connections
>> >>>> >> get
>> >>>> >> closed that way.  The thing about the deflate stream not ending
>> >>>> >> neatly
>> >>>> >> is also not uncommon.  Were you able to access websites with that
>> >>>> >> configuration?  It's the crash that you saw earlier that concerns
>> >>>> >> me
>> >>>> >> as long as everything else is working alright.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 15:38, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >> > Hi
>> >>>> >> > My initial settings are same as the
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > Proxying over a WAN using SOCKS
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > Example, in this example Zlib is not enabled and I get the error
>> >>>> >> > mentioned
>> >>>> >> > in the last emails, upon disabling xcodec and enabling zlib as
>> >>>> >> > in
>> >>>> >> > the
>> >>>> >> > config
>> >>>> >> > example "only relevant top part" I get this error :
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > Server
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > create codec codec0
>> >>>> >> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
>> >>>> >> > #activate codec0
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > set codec0.compressor zlib
>> >>>> >> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
>> >>>> >> > activate codec0
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > Client
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > create codec codec0
>> >>>> >> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
>> >>>> >> > #activate codec0
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > set codec0.compressor zlib
>> >>>> >> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
>> >>>> >> > activate codec0
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > I get this error :
>> >>>> >> > 1324250995.222191 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >>>> >> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>>> >> > <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> > [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> > 1324250995.222342 [/zlib/deflate_pipe] ERR: virtual
>> >>>> >> > DeflatePipe::~DeflatePipe(): Deflate stream did not end cleanly.
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > When I commented out the activate codec line using the same
>> >>>> >> > config
>> >>>> >> > copied
>> >>>> >> > above I got this error :
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > 1324251200.589366 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >>>> >> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >>>> >> > <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> > [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> > wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >> Hi
>> >>>> >> >> Did svn up to 897 ..did make clean and called make, will update
>> >>>> >> >> with
>> >>>> >> >> results, if I get errors will disable zlib and report back as
>> >>>> >> >> well.
>> >>>> >> >> Regards
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> I meant the binary on both the client and the server.
>> >>>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> To disable zlib, just comment out or remove the lines like
>> >>>> >> >>> these
>> >>>> >> >>> in
>> >>>> >> >>> each codec configuration.
>> >>>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> set codec0.compressor zlib
>> >>>> >> >>> set codec0.compressor_level 6
>> >>>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> But actually, it would probably be best for you to just update
>> >>>> >> >>> and
>> >>>> >> >>> rebuild without changing your configuration.  Just do "svn up"
>> >>>> >> >>> at
>> >>>> >> >>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> top level directory and do "make clean" and "make" in
>> >>>> >> >>> programs/wanproxy.
>> >>>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>> >> >>> Juli.
>> >>>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 14:28, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> > Hi
>> >>>> >> >>> > First of all, let me express my appreciations for all the
>> >>>> >> >>> > support
>> >>>> >> >>> > and
>> >>>> >> >>> > help,
>> >>>> >> >>> > Open source products are the result of collaboration between
>> >>>> >> >>> > the
>> >>>> >> >>> > people
>> >>>> >> >>> > who
>> >>>> >> >>> > do the hard work like yourself, and people who make use of
>> >>>> >> >>> > the
>> >>>> >> >>> > creativity/productivity of people like yourself, that would
>> >>>> >> >>> > be
>> >>>> >> >>> > me
>> >>>> >> >>> > :).
>> >>>> >> >>> > So I
>> >>>> >> >>> > do not mind doing some testing and debugging.
>> >>>> >> >>> > Having said that, you want me to make clean and make
>> >>>> >> >>> > recompile
>> >>>> >> >>> > at
>> >>>> >> >>> > the
>> >>>> >> >>> > trunk
>> >>>> >> >>> > level ? How to test without zlib/zcodec ? Removing parts of
>> >>>> >> >>> > config ?
>> >>>> >> >>> > The
>> >>>> >> >>> > only binary I am using is wanproxy that I copied to
>> >>>> >> >>> > /usr/sbin/
>> >>>> >> >>> > did I
>> >>>> >> >>> > miss
>> >>>> >> >>> > something here ? What is the second binary ?
>> >>>> >> >>> > Regards
>> >>>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>>> >> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> I thought I had fixed this problem.  You are using both
>> >>>> >> >>> >> zlib
>> >>>> >> >>> >> and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> xcodec, right?  I do not understand how this error could
>> >>>> >> >>> >> still
>> >>>> >> >>> >> be
>> >>>> >> >>> >> happening.  If you could try with only xcodec or only zlib,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> that
>> >>>> >> >>> >> might
>> >>>> >> >>> >> be helpful to me, so I know which component is in need of
>> >>>> >> >>> >> further
>> >>>> >> >>> >> testing.
>> >>>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> Also, if you want to update the whole tree and rebuild both
>> >>>> >> >>> >> binaries,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> I've added some messages which should make it easier to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> tell
>> >>>> >> >>> >> which
>> >>>> >> >>> >> PipeProducer subclass is doing the wrong thing here.
>> >>>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> Apologies for all the difficulty.  I want you to know that
>> >>>> >> >>> >> I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> have
>> >>>> >> >>> >> been
>> >>>> >> >>> >> testing this, and did originally see the problem you report
>> >>>> >> >>> >> here,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> but
>> >>>> >> >>> >> did find a way to fix it.  I have some work I need to do
>> >>>> >> >>> >> today
>> >>>> >> >>> >> that
>> >>>> >> >>> >> I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> do not want to disrupt, but I am hoping that later in my
>> >>>> >> >>> >> evening
>> >>>> >> >>> >> (I'm
>> >>>> >> >>> >> on the west coast of the US) I will be able to set up a few
>> >>>> >> >>> >> more
>> >>>> >> >>> >> systems to use in testing, and see if I can trigger this
>> >>>> >> >>> >> bug.
>> >>>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:21, Ali Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > Hi
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > Client crashed when a page displayed flash, with
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > following
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > error
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > 1324214230.331051 [/assert] EMERG: void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*):
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > Halting: Assertion (!output_eos_) failed at
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in function void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > Aborted
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > Regards
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Ali Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> Hi July
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> I was able to make the connection work, it was a stupid
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> mistake
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> on
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> my
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> side, the errors are less and performance is slightly
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> better but
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> still
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> slow
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> I am getting these errors on client side now
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212755.168570 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212756.652634 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212776.041883 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212777.468335 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> On server side I am getting
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184191.330804
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184194.297132
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184202.948238
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184202.951848
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184217.752559
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184217.755806
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> Regards
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Very strange.  Can you send the client and server
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> configurations?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>  I'm
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> guessing that connect is failing because the ports are
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> mismatched
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> or
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> similar, but I can't be sure.  It would also be helpful
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> if
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> could
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> telnet from the client to the port the server is
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> supposed
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> to be
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> listening on, to verify that there are no firewalling
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> issues
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> involved.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 15:21, Ali Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Hi Juli
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Did checkout to version 895 on both machines and did
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > following
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > on
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > both
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > machines as well , make clean in programs/wanproxy,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > make,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > copy
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > file
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > to /usr/sbin/ then launch
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c /etc/wanproxy.conf
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > On the client I get
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337113 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/listener]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Listening
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > on:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > [0.0.0.0]:3300
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337732 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > event
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > thread.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163930.640914 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163931.393061 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.144333 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.919439 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163933.906755 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163934.677630 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163935.459671 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > And the browser is not working when setting socks to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > use
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > client.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Anything I missed here ?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > Thanks
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ali Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Hi
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> The problem happened on the latest trunk that I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> donwload
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> just
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> after
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> your
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> latest email, I will checkout trunk, clean and make
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> send
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> output.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Thank agains
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Regards
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> First, update to latest trunk since I fixed the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> issues
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> you've
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> reported so
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> far.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Then could you go to programs/wanproxy on the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> client,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> "make
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> clean",
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> and then send all of the output of "make" to the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> list?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Juli.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:23, Ali Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > Hi Juli
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > Thanks for the continous help, I have one on the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > latest
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > trunk,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > but
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > client I get errors while compiling the trunk on,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > problem is
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > related to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > this it seems  "result of make in
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > programs/wanproxy/"
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> instantiation
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> of
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘class
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> but
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> non-virtual
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> destructor
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ProxyListener’ has
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> virtual
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> functions
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> but non-virtual destructor
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Hi Ali,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks for pointing out the problems with
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -Wnon-virtual-dtor —
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> fixed
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> those just now.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> You need to have the client and server running
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> same
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> version.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  The
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> protocol has changed considerable from 0.7.2 to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> today,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> should
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> not mix the two.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> That said, I think you may have some other
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> problem
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> with
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> errors
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you're seeing; I don't think the mix of versions
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> would
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> explain
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> it.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Still, if you would update both to trunk and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> report
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> any
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> issues
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> encounter back, I'll try to fix them as soon as
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> possible.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  If
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> continue to experience issues, I'll set up a
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> CentOS
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> VM
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> test
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> everything myself before asking you to do so
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> again.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Sorry about the continued difficulty.  I usually
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> try
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> very
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> hard
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> make
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> sure users have a seamless experience of
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> building
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> using
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> WANProxy.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Once this is all resolved, I'll put out a
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> release
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> tarball,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> too.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Juli.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 05:44, Ali Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Right now using latest trunk for server, and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > latest
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > tgz
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > for
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > client
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  I am
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > getting this error
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [root at CentOS54 programs]# /usr/sbin/wanproxy
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > -c
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  /etc/wanproxy.conf
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.168662 [/wanproxy] INFO: WANProxy
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 0.7.2
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.169621 [/wanproxy] INFO: Copyright
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > (c)
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 2008-2011
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.org.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.170510 [/wanproxy] INFO: All rights
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > reserved.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.171419 [/wanproxy/config] INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Configuring
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173140 [/io/system] INFO: Starting
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > IO
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > system.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173861 [/event/thread] INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Starting
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > event
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > thread.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.092574
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.895308
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129320.699028
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129321.499178
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ali Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> If I go to the programs/wanproxy and just
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> make
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> there
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> get
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> instantiation of
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘class
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> functions
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> but
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> non-virtual
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> destructor
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ProxyListener’
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> has
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> virtual
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> functions
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> but non-virtual destructor
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Juli Mallett
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Hi Ali,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> The problems you encountered should be fixed
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> in
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Subversion.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Can
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> please provide the errors you encountered?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Most
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> commonly,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> problem
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> is missing libuuid-dev or similar package,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> at
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> least
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> on
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Linux
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> systems.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Juli.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:56, Ali Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Hi
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > I tried to install latest src code but did
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > only
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > run
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > in to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > during compiling, but 0.7.2 did not face
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > any
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > issues,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > did
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > face
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems with websites opening during that
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > error ?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Regards
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Diego
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Woitasen
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > <diego at woitasen.com.ar>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Juli
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Mallett
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Ali,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 13:08, Ali Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> and on the client I am getting
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524646.018556
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ERR:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event):
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Unexpected
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> event:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <Error>/32
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [Broken pipe]
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524690.407944 [/assert] EMERG: void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*):
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Halting:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Assertion
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> (!output_eos_)
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed at
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> function
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Aborted
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks.  Several other users have
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> reported
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> this,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> but I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> have
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> not
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> been
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> able to reproduce it.  I will redouble
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> my
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> efforts
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> reproduce.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Ali
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Hi
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Browsers are FF 4.x and 3.x on Windows
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Linux,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> also
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tried
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> IE8,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the config is the same one given in
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> examples,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> OS
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> is
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> CentOS
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 5.6
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 64bit.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Regards
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Juli
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Mallett
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks for the feedback.  I don't
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> think
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> will
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> access,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> may
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need more configuration information
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> reproduce.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> OS
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> WANProxy
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> running on?  Can you send your
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> configuration?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> browser
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> client?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks!
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 13:44, Ali
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Hi
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the help so far, I might
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> be
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> able
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> give
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> access
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> check it out if needed, as for now
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> no
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> IPV6,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> sites
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> like
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> cnn
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> youtube etc
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:34 AM,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Juli
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Mallett
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> This seems very strange.  Which
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> sites?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  Do
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> have
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv6
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> connectivity?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you don't have IPv6
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> connectivity,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wonder
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> if
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> that
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> might
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> be
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> problem, and we might need some way
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> tell
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> WANProxy
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> use
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv4
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> only.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you have specific examples that
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> likely
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> will
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> make
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> it
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> easier
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> for me
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to reproduce and fix.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks & sorry to hear about your
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> difficulty,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Juli.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:04, Ali
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Hi
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I completed the setup, but some
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sites
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> open
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sites
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> need to be reloaded a few times
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> for
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> it to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> work,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I.e.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> CSS
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> does
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not load
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> etc.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas ?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:27 AM,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Juli
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Mallett
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ali,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you already have the SOCKS
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> example
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configured,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> then
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> should be
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> able to use your browser or
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> operating
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> system's
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> proxy
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configuration to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell it to use SOCKS for HTTP or
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> FTP
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> or
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> whatever
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> protocols
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> need.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have trouble finding this
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> what
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> OS
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> browser or
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> other software you're using I'm
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> sure
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> one
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> can
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> help
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> get the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> information you need!
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Juli.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 03:26, Ali
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Jawad
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did setup wanproxy in
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client/server
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> mode
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> as
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> per
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Proxying over a
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN using SOCKS example in
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://wanproxy.org/examples.shtml
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> . Here
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is the issue
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do have a server in Asia which
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> a
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in the USA
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> which is the wanproxy server, I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> want
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> traffic
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> for
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsing
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through the wanproxy link and
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> from
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> there
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> fetch
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sites I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need in
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the states and send them back
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> after
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> that
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> link
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client server which sends them
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browser
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in my LAN.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is this something WAN proxy does
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need to
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> do
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> additional
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> stuff ?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Such as setting up SQUID on
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> or
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Is any
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ip forwarding needed ? What
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> should I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> use
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsers
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ?
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry for the long list of
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> questions,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> but
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> am
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sure
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> will come
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in handy for people who research
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> topic
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> online
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> "once
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> answered that
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is :)"
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy mailing list
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy mailing list
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Hi,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  I had that error with the 0.7.2 release.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> I'm
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> using
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> latest
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> code
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> from subversion and I haven't seen the
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> error
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> again.
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Regards,
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  Diego
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Diego Woitasen
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>> >
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>
>