<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hello Juli,<br><br>Excellent and great advance in WANProxy for this month. Finally, on-disk cache is in progress<br>to be supported officially. I wanted to ask, what is the difference between your on-disk cache implementation <br>and Deigo implementation? I mean why you started from scratch, and not build on what Deigo has done?<br><br>Another thing, in the current implementation, is the on-disk cache works two ways direction, I mean upload/download both are considered to fill the cache?<br><br>BTW, last time I faced a problem showing error:[/zlib/inflate_pipe] ERR: virtual void InflatePipe::consume<br>If you can help I would be appreciated; here is the link: http://lists.wanproxy.org/pipermail/wanproxy-wanproxy.org/2015-January/001555.html<br><br>Regards,<br>Ahmed </div></body>
</html>