Speed Up WAN Link..Ideas needed

Tue Dec 20 13:02:43 PST 2011

Hi Juli
I did try different codecs and monitored the client and server, the problem
happens with xcodec after leaving it on for a while the client crashes,
when I start it and browse anything it just keeps crashing. This stops to
happen when I restart wanproxy on the server.
Thanks

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Juli
> I will certainly try to track down the crash by using each codec alone and
> both together and none, having said that can you please post a config
> example of both working together, the example I am using from the site only
> makes use of xcodec, I was able to use zlib but I am not sure how to
> combine both to work. Another thing is that some of the users have
> ipads/iphones and other devices that are not SOCKS friendly, any
> suggestions on how to allow those devices to utilize the enhanced WAN link
> ?
> Regards
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:03, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > I have to note that I did do the testing with a partner at a different
>> > physical location. My Linux laptop with FF and Chrome did not cause a
>> crash,
>> > his Chrome/FF and IE caused the crash. I will retest with him today and
>> let
>> > you know results. What is better to use in terms of speed zlib or
>> xcodec ?
>> > Regards
>>
>> At this point I would suggest not disabling either one.  XCodec does
>> the deduplication that is at the heart of WAN Optimization — it
>> remembers chunks of data across many connections to reduce the amount
>> of data sent over the network.  zlib does ephemeral compression,
>> taking the output of XCodec and compressing it using a standard
>> compression algorithm.  The two work together quite well.  I would
>> like to track down and fix the crash you saw.
>>
>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Neither of those errors is necessarily bad.  A lot of connections get
>> >> closed that way.  The thing about the deflate stream not ending neatly
>> >> is also not uncommon.  Were you able to access websites with that
>> >> configuration?  It's the crash that you saw earlier that concerns me
>> >> as long as everything else is working alright.
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 15:38, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi
>> >> > My initial settings are same as the
>> >> >
>> >> > Proxying over a WAN using SOCKS
>> >> >
>> >> > Example, in this example Zlib is not enabled and I get the error
>> >> > mentioned
>> >> > in the last emails, upon disabling xcodec and enabling zlib as in the
>> >> > config
>> >> > example "only relevant top part" I get this error :
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Server
>> >> >
>> >> > create codec codec0
>> >> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
>> >> > #activate codec0
>> >> >
>> >> > set codec0.compressor zlib
>> >> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
>> >> > activate codec0
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Client
>> >> >
>> >> > create codec codec0
>> >> > #set codec0.codec XCodec
>> >> > #activate codec0
>> >> >
>> >> > set codec0.compressor zlib
>> >> > set codec0.compressor_level 6
>> >> > activate codec0
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I get this error :
>> >> > 1324250995.222191 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
>> >> > [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> > 1324250995.222342 [/zlib/deflate_pipe] ERR: virtual
>> >> > DeflatePipe::~DeflatePipe(): Deflate stream did not end cleanly.
>> >> >
>> >> > When I commented out the activate codec line using the same config
>> >> > copied
>> >> > above I got this error :
>> >> >
>> >> > 1324251200.589366 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR: void
>> >> > ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event: <Error>/104
>> >> > [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi
>> >> >> Did svn up to 897 ..did make clean and called make, will update with
>> >> >> results, if I get errors will disable zlib and report back as well.
>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Juli Mallett <
>> juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I meant the binary on both the client and the server.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> To disable zlib, just comment out or remove the lines like these in
>> >> >>> each codec configuration.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> set codec0.compressor zlib
>> >> >>> set codec0.compressor_level 6
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> But actually, it would probably be best for you to just update and
>> >> >>> rebuild without changing your configuration.  Just do "svn up" at
>> the
>> >> >>> top level directory and do "make clean" and "make" in
>> >> >>> programs/wanproxy.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Thanks!
>> >> >>> Juli.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 14:28, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> > Hi
>> >> >>> > First of all, let me express my appreciations for all the support
>> >> >>> > and
>> >> >>> > help,
>> >> >>> > Open source products are the result of collaboration between the
>> >> >>> > people
>> >> >>> > who
>> >> >>> > do the hard work like yourself, and people who make use of the
>> >> >>> > creativity/productivity of people like yourself, that would be me
>> >> >>> > :).
>> >> >>> > So I
>> >> >>> > do not mind doing some testing and debugging.
>> >> >>> > Having said that, you want me to make clean and make recompile at
>> >> >>> > the
>> >> >>> > trunk
>> >> >>> > level ? How to test without zlib/zcodec ? Removing parts of
>> config ?
>> >> >>> > The
>> >> >>> > only binary I am using is wanproxy that I copied to /usr/sbin/
>> did I
>> >> >>> > miss
>> >> >>> > something here ? What is the second binary ?
>> >> >>> > Regards
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> I thought I had fixed this problem.  You are using both zlib and
>> >> >>> >> xcodec, right?  I do not understand how this error could still
>> be
>> >> >>> >> happening.  If you could try with only xcodec or only zlib, that
>> >> >>> >> might
>> >> >>> >> be helpful to me, so I know which component is in need of
>> further
>> >> >>> >> testing.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Also, if you want to update the whole tree and rebuild both
>> >> >>> >> binaries,
>> >> >>> >> I've added some messages which should make it easier to tell
>> which
>> >> >>> >> PipeProducer subclass is doing the wrong thing here.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Apologies for all the difficulty.  I want you to know that I
>> have
>> >> >>> >> been
>> >> >>> >> testing this, and did originally see the problem you report
>> here,
>> >> >>> >> but
>> >> >>> >> did find a way to fix it.  I have some work I need to do today
>> that
>> >> >>> >> I
>> >> >>> >> do not want to disrupt, but I am hoping that later in my evening
>> >> >>> >> (I'm
>> >> >>> >> on the west coast of the US) I will be able to set up a few more
>> >> >>> >> systems to use in testing, and see if I can trigger this bug.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:21, Ali Jawad <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > Hi
>> >> >>> >> > Client crashed when a page displayed flash, with following
>> error
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1324214230.331051 [/assert] EMERG: void
>> >> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*):
>> >> >>> >> > Halting: Assertion (!output_eos_) failed at
>> >> >>> >> > ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in function void
>> >> >>> >> > PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>> >> >>> >> > Aborted
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Regards
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Ali Jawad <
>> alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Hi July
>> >> >>> >> >> I was able to make the connection work, it was a stupid
>> mistake
>> >> >>> >> >> on
>> >> >>> >> >> my
>> >> >>> >> >> side, the errors are less and performance is slightly better
>> but
>> >> >>> >> >> still
>> >> >>> >> >> slow
>> >> >>> >> >> I am getting these errors on client side now
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212755.168570 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR:
>> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212756.652634 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR:
>> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212776.041883 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR:
>> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324212777.468335 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] ERR:
>> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> On server side I am getting
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184191.330804 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> ERR:
>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184194.297132 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> ERR:
>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184202.948238 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> ERR:
>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184202.951848 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> ERR:
>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184217.752559 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> ERR:
>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >> 1324184217.755806 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy-socks0/connector]
>> ERR:
>> >> >>> >> >> void
>> >> >>> >> >> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event): Unexpected event:
>> >> >>> >> >> <Error>/104
>> >> >>> >> >> [Connection reset by peer]
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> Very strange.  Can you send the client and server
>> >> >>> >> >>> configurations?
>> >> >>> >> >>>  I'm
>> >> >>> >> >>> guessing that connect is failing because the ports are
>> >> >>> >> >>> mismatched
>> >> >>> >> >>> or
>> >> >>> >> >>> similar, but I can't be sure.  It would also be helpful if
>> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> could
>> >> >>> >> >>> telnet from the client to the port the server is supposed
>> to be
>> >> >>> >> >>> listening on, to verify that there are no firewalling issues
>> >> >>> >> >>> involved.
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 15:21, Ali Jawad <
>> alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Hi Juli
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Did checkout to version 895 on both machines and did the
>> >> >>> >> >>> > following
>> >> >>> >> >>> > on
>> >> >>> >> >>> > both
>> >> >>> >> >>> > machines as well , make clean in programs/wanproxy, make,
>> >> >>> >> >>> > copy
>> >> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
>> >> >>> >> >>> > file
>> >> >>> >> >>> > to /usr/sbin/ then launch
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> > /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c /etc/wanproxy.conf
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> > On the client I get
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337113 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/listener] INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Listening
>> >> >>> >> >>> > on:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > [0.0.0.0]:3300
>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163928.337732 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting event
>> >> >>> >> >>> > thread.
>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163930.640914 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163931.393061 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.144333 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163932.919439 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163933.906755 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163934.677630 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> > 1324163935.459671 [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector] INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> > And the browser is not working when setting socks to use
>> >> >>> >> >>> > wanproxy
>> >> >>> >> >>> > client.
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Anything I missed here ?
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> > Thanks
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Hi
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> The problem happened on the latest trunk that I donwload
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> just
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> after
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> your
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> latest email, I will checkout trunk, clean and make and
>> send
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> output.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Thank agains
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Regards
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> First, update to latest trunk since I fixed the issues
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> you've
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> reported so
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> far.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Then could you go to programs/wanproxy on the client,
>> "make
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> clean",
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> and then send all of the output of "make" to the list?
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Juli.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:23, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > Hi Juli
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > Thanks for the continous help, I have one on the
>> latest
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > trunk,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > but
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > client I get errors while compiling the trunk on, the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > problem is
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > related to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > this it seems  "result of make in programs/wanproxy/"
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation of
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning: ‘class
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> non-virtual
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> destructor
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class ProxyListener’
>> has
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> virtual
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> functions
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> but non-virtual destructor
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Hi Ali,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks for pointing out the problems with
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -Wnon-virtual-dtor —
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> fixed
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> those just now.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> You need to have the client and server running the
>> same
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> version.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  The
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> protocol has changed considerable from 0.7.2 to
>> today,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> and
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> should
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> not mix the two.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> That said, I think you may have some other problem
>> with
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> errors
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you're seeing; I don't think the mix of versions
>> would
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> explain
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> it.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Still, if you would update both to trunk and report
>> any
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> issues
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> encounter back, I'll try to fix them as soon as
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> possible.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>  If
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> continue to experience issues, I'll set up a CentOS
>> VM
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> test
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> everything myself before asking you to do so again.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Sorry about the continued difficulty.  I usually try
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> very
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> hard
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> make
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> sure users have a seamless experience of building and
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> using
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> WANProxy.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Once this is all resolved, I'll put out a release
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> tarball,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> too.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Juli.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 05:44, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Right now using latest trunk for server, and latest
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > tgz
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > for
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > client
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  I am
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > getting this error
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > [root at CentOS54 programs]# /usr/sbin/wanproxy -c
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >  /etc/wanproxy.conf
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.168662 [/wanproxy] INFO: WANProxy 0.7.2
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.169621 [/wanproxy] INFO: Copyright (c)
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 2008-2011
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.org.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.170510 [/wanproxy] INFO: All rights
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > reserved.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.171419 [/wanproxy/config] INFO:
>> Configuring
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > WANProxy.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173140 [/io/system] INFO: Starting IO
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > system.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129297.173861 [/event/thread] INFO: Starting
>> event
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > thread.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.092574
>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129319.895308
>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129320.699028
>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > 1324129321.499178
>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > INFO:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > Connect
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > failed:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <Error>/0 [Success]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> If I go to the programs/wanproxy and just make
>> there
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> get
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h: In instantiation
>> of
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ‘SimpleServer<TCPServer>’:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10:   instantiated from here
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> ../../io/socket/simple_server.h:12: warning:
>> ‘class
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> SimpleServer<TCPServer>’ has virtual functions but
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> non-virtual
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> destructor
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> proxy_listener.h:10: warning: ‘class
>> ProxyListener’
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> has
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> virtual
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> functions
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> but non-virtual destructor
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> make: *** [proxy_listener.o] Error 1
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Hi Ali,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> The problems you encountered should be fixed in
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Subversion.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>  Can
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> please provide the errors you encountered?  Most
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> commonly,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> problem
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> is missing libuuid-dev or similar package, at
>> least
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> on
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Linux
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> systems.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Thanks!
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Juli.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:56, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Hi
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > I tried to install latest src code but did only
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > run
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > in to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > during compiling, but 0.7.2 did not face any
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > issues,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > did
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > face
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > problems with websites opening during that
>> error ?
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > Regards
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Diego Woitasen
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > <diego at woitasen.com.ar>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Juli Mallett
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Ali,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 13:08, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> and on the client I am getting
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524646.018556
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [/wanproxy/proxy/proxy0/connector]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ERR:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ProxyConnector::splice_complete(Event):
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Unexpected
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> event:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <Error>/32
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> [Broken pipe]
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 1323524690.407944 [/assert] EMERG: void
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*): Halting:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Assertion
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> (!output_eos_)
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed at
>> ../../io/pipe/pipe_producer.cc:109 in
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> function
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> void
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> PipeProducer::produce(Buffer*).
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Aborted
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks.  Several other users have reported
>> this,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> but I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> have
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> not
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> been
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> able to reproduce it.  I will redouble my
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> efforts
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> reproduce.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Hi
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Browsers are FF 4.x and 3.x on Windows and
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Linux,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> also
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tried
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> IE8,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the config is the same one given in the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> examples,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> OS
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> is
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> CentOS
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 5.6
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> 64bit.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Regards
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Juli
>> Mallett
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks for the feedback.  I don't think I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> will
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> access,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> may
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> need more configuration information to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> reproduce.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> OS
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> WANProxy
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> running on?  Can you send your
>> configuration?
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>  What
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> browser
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> is
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> client?
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Thanks!
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 13:44, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Hi
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the help so far, I might be
>> able
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> give
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> access
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> check it out if needed, as for now no
>> IPV6,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> sites
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> like
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> cnn
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> youtube etc
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Juli
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Mallett
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> This seems very strange.  Which sites?
>>  Do
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> have
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv6
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> connectivity?
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you don't have IPv6 connectivity, I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wonder
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> if
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> that
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> might
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> be
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> problem, and we might need some way to
>> tell
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> WANProxy
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> use
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> IPv4
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> only.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>  If you have specific examples that
>> likely
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> will
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> make
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> it
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> easier
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> for me
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> to reproduce and fix.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks & sorry to hear about your
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> difficulty,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Juli.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:04, Ali Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Hi
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I completed the setup, but some sites
>> open
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> some
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sites
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> need to be reloaded a few times for it
>> to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> work,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I.e.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> CSS
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> does
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> not load
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> etc.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas ?
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Regards
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Juli
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> Mallett
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> <juli at clockworksquid.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ali,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you already have the SOCKS example
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configured,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> then
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> should be
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> able to use your browser or operating
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> system's
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> proxy
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> configuration to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tell it to use SOCKS for HTTP or FTP
>> or
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> whatever
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> protocols
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> need.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have trouble finding this and
>> tell
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> what
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> OS
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> browser or
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> other software you're using I'm sure
>> one
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> of
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> us
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> can
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> help
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> get the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> information you need!
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Juli.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 03:26, Ali
>> Jawad
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> <alijawad1 at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did setup wanproxy in client/server
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> mode
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> as
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> per
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Proxying over a
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN using SOCKS example in
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://wanproxy.org/examples.shtml
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> . Here
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is the issue
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do have a server in Asia which is
>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> and
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> a
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in the USA
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> which is the wanproxy server, I want
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> traffic
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> for
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsing
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through the wanproxy link and from
>> there
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> fetch
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sites I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need in
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the states and send them back after
>> that
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> through
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> WAN
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> link
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> to the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client server which sends them to the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browser
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in my LAN.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is this something WAN proxy does ?
>> Do I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> need to
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> do
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> additional
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> stuff ?
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Such as setting up SQUID on wanproxy
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> or
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> client
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> server
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Is any
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ip forwarding needed ? What
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> should I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> use
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> browsers
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ?
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry for the long list of
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> questions,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> but
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> am
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> sure
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> it
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> will come
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in handy for people who research the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> topic
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> online
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> "once
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> answered that
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is :)"
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy mailing list
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy mailing list
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Hi,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  I had that error with the 0.7.2 release. I'm
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> using
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> the
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> latest
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> code
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> from subversion and I haven't seen the error
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> again.
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Regards,
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>  Diego
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Diego Woitasen
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wanproxy.org/pipermail/wanproxy-wanproxy.org/attachments/20111221/1ddc20e8/attachment-0005.htm>