Transparent proxy

[Igor Ivanov]

Hi Juli,

Thanks for the quick response.
I'm a little confused: using SOCKS is not transparent for the end users,
unless you had a different setup in mind.
I will probably be able to get a budget for this (need to verify).

Thanks,
Igor


On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Juli Mallett <juli at clockworksquid.com>wrote:

> Igor,
>
> 0.8.0 isn't missing much of interest.  trunk is broken on Linux, yes, but
> much of trunk's development is still in-progress, including support for
> transparent proxying.  A roadmap is a hard thing to construct here as I'm
> pretty overloaded, and Pat is working mostly on the internals of libuinet
> (the TCP/IP stack).  I'd suggest testing 0.8.0 as a SOCKS proxy to see if
> WANProxy will meet your needs.  If you have a budget for this work, I might
> be able to refer you to someone who could do the work, or even clear out a
> hole in my schedule, that you need.
>
> Thanks,
> Juli.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Igor Ivanov <iivanovforever at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looking into WANProxy to accelerate inter-branches traffic
>> transparently. Is this option available (couldn't find how can I do that)?
>> If not, where does it stand in the roadmap?
>>
>> Also, can I use WANProxy in production? The latest release 0.8.0 seems
>> pretty old and the tip of the source trunk doesn't compile on my Linux :(
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Igor
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wanproxy mailing list
>> wanproxy at lists.wanproxy.org
>> http://lists.wanproxy.org/listinfo.cgi/wanproxy-wanproxy.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wanproxy.org/pipermail/wanproxy-wanproxy.org/attachments/20140129/98429da5/attachment-0002.htm>