Thank you!!!

[Levente Peres]

Just an advice from someone who now has 12 users pulling and pushing
some Kb to 8Gb files over this piece of wonder from 08:00 to 18:00...

after you're confortable with your setup, take heed what's written on
the homepage and make friends with the idea of building wanproxy with

make NDEBUG=1

For me it at least doubled the performance so far, but can't be sure
until tomorrow's main showtime...

L.

On 01/15/2015 01:32 PM, Levente Peres wrote:
> Just wanted to give some additional feedback.
>
> Samba 4.1.1 works just fine without bellow connection handling, for now.
>
> What happens is that when WanProxy client drops, then after some time,
> the connection is dropped clean. So no such issue that I mentioned as of
> yet.
>
> Here's a happy camper...
>
> Very well done piece of stuff...
>
> Also... current uninterrupted uptime 21hrs... hope to see much more...
>
> Levente
>
> On 01/13/2015 05:57 PM, Levente Peres wrote:
>> gosh sorry, typo...
>>
>> for the second set of config opts
>>
>> reset on zero vc = 0 not 1
>>
>>
>> On 01/13/2015 05:51 PM, Levente Peres wrote:
>>> Correction
>>>
>>> I managed to work around the problem.
>>>
>>> You see - I use it to accelerate SMB connections. So in my Samba 4.1.1
>>> server I changed these lines
>>>
>>> socket options=IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=12582912 SO_SNDBUF=12582912
>>> TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_KEEPIDLE=300
>>> TCP_KEEPINTVL=10 TCP_KEEPCNT=5
>>> reset on zero vc = 1
>>>
>>> ... to this ...
>>>
>>> socket options=IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=12582912 SO_SNDBUF=12582912
>>> TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT
>>> reset on zero vc = 1
>>>
>>> As you can see, had to remove any and all stale/dead process management
>>> instructions from Samba config, and so the large file issue went away.
>>>
>>> I see problems with cluttered samba connections because of this down the
>>> line, but... for now it works.
>>>
>>> Levente
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/13/2015 05:18 PM, Levente Peres wrote:
>>>> Dear Juli and EE,
>>>>
>>>> THIS SOFTWARE IS REALLY SOMETHING!!!
>>>>
>>>> Even in it's pre-release state, it has helped me more than anything in
>>>> this category.
>>>>
>>>> Ingenious. Period.
>>>>
>>>> Just wanted to say this after using it in PRODUCTION environment for few
>>>> days now.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it has issues... but the only serious problem i found so far was
>>>> that when a user copies large (>>1GB) files, it starts ranting about
>>>> connection refused and reset, etc. and in parallel users experience 2-5
>>>> second "delays" in transfer progress. But the transfer finishes
>>>> nevertheless.
>>>>
>>>> That said, ITS GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> THANK YOU for developing this piece of greatness. Really helps us out...
>>>>
>>>> I see this thing rise right beside rsync in a couple years.
>>>>
>>>> CHEERS
>>>>
>>>> Levente
>>>>
>>>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wanproxy.org/pipermail/wanproxy-wanproxy.org/attachments/20150115/4a2a96d7/attachment.htm>